‍

In the rapidly evolving landscape of User Experience Research (UXR), one challenge stands out consistently: effectively communicating the value of UXR to stakeholders across the organization. As our recent whitepaper "The Value of UXR in 2024" reveals, the success of UXR initiatives often hinges not just on the quality of the research itself, but on how well its insights are integrated into decision-making processes. Let's explore how stakeholder integration can be the key to unlocking the full potential of UXR.

‍

Identifying key stakeholders and their needs 🕵️

‍

The first step in effective stakeholder integration is identifying who your key stakeholders are and understanding their specific needs and priorities. These stakeholders might include:

‍

1. Executive leadership: Interested in high-level insights that tie directly to business goals and ROI.
2. Product managers: Looking for actionable insights to inform product roadmaps and feature prioritization.
3. Designers: Seeking detailed user feedback to inform design decisions.
4. Developers: Needing clear, implementable recommendations.
5. Marketing teams: Interested in user perceptions and preferences to inform messaging and positioning.

‍

As one UX leader in our study noted,

‍

"Understanding the unique perspectives and priorities of each stakeholder group is crucial for effectively communicating the value of UXR."

‍

Techniques for effective stakeholder engagement 🦄

‍

Once you've identified your key stakeholders, the next step is to engage them effectively throughout the research process. Some proven techniques include:

‍

1. Early involvement: Include stakeholders in the research planning phase to ensure alignment with business objectives.
2. Observational opportunities: Invite stakeholders to observe user research sessions firsthand, fostering empathy and understanding.
3. Regular check-ins: Schedule frequent touchpoints to share interim findings and gather feedback.
4. Collaborative analysis: Involve stakeholders in data analysis sessions to leverage their expertise and build buy-in.

‍

Our survey revealed that organizations with high levels of stakeholder engagement throughout the research process reported significantly higher perceived value of UXR.

‍

Tailoring UXR communications for different audiences 📣

‍

One size does not fit all when it comes to communicating UXR insights. As one research manager in our study observed,

‍

"When we started tailoring our research reports to different stakeholder groups, we saw a dramatic increase in the adoption of our insights."

‍

To maximize impact, it's crucial to tailor your communications to different audiences:

‍

For executives 👩💼

‍

When communicating with executives, it's crucial to get straight to the point and demonstrate the business value of UXR:

‍

• Highlight key findings that directly impact business goals (e.g., user retention, conversion rates, market share)
• Use executive summaries that can be quickly scanned (no more than one page)
• Create clear, impactful data visualizations (e.g., dashboards, infographics) that show trends and comparisons
• Provide concrete examples of how UXR insights have led to measurable business improvements
• Include ROI calculations where possible, showing the financial impact of UXR-driven decisions
• Use benchmarks and industry comparisons to contextualize findings
• Anticipate and address potential business implications and strategic questions

‍

For example, instead of detailing usability issues, present a graph showing how addressing these issues could potentially increase customer satisfaction scores by X% and reduce churn by Y%.

‍

For product teams 📦

‍

Product teams need comprehensive insights that can directly inform their decision-making:

‍

• Present detailed user personas and scenarios to bring user needs to life
• Use user journey maps to illustrate pain points and opportunities across the entire user experience
• Provide specific, prioritized feature recommendations based on user needs and preferences
• Include case studies of similar products or features to provide context and inspiration
• Present quantitative data on feature usage and user preferences
• Offer clear next steps and actionable items for the product roadmap
• Use interactive prototypes or mockups to illustrate potential solutions

‍

For instance, create a user journey map that highlights key pain points in the current product, then overlay recommended features or improvements at each stage of the journey.

‍

For design teams 🎨🖌️

‍

Designers need rich, detailed feedback on the visual and interactive aspects of the product:

‍

• Provide specific user feedback on colors, layouts, interactions, and other design elements
• Use heat maps and click maps to show how users interact with designs
• Include video clips of usability testing sessions to show real user reactions and behaviors
• Highlight powerful user quotes that capture emotional responses to designs
• Present before-and-after comparisons to illustrate the impact of design changes
• Use annotation tools to pinpoint specific areas of designs that need attention
• Organize feedback by design principle (e.g., consistency, accessibility, simplicity) to align with design thinking

‍

For example, create a gallery of video clips showing users struggling with a particular interface element, paired with quotes expressing their frustration and suggestions for improvement.

‍

For development teams 👾 👾 👾

‍

Developers need concrete, implementable insights:

‍

• Provide a prioritized list of usability issues, bugs, or areas for improvement
• Use technical specifications and measurements where relevant (e.g., load times, error rates)
• Include device and browser information for reported issues
• Utilize developer-friendly formats like issue trackers or ticketing systems
• Provide clear acceptance criteria for recommended changes
• Include code snippets or pseudocode to illustrate potential solutions where appropriate
• Use flow diagrams to illustrate complex user interactions or system behaviors
• Highlight any technical constraints or considerations uncovered during research

‍

For instance, create a prioritized list of usability issues in a format that can be directly imported into the development team's project management tool, complete with severity ratings, reproduction steps, and suggested solutions.

‍

By tailoring your communication in these ways, you ensure that each stakeholder group receives the information they need in a format that resonates with their priorities and workflow. This targeted approach increases the likelihood that your UXR insights will be understood, valued, and acted upon across the organization.

‍

Building long-term stakeholder relationships 🏗️

‍

Building long-term stakeholder relationships is crucial for effective UXR integration, and it's an ongoing process rather than a one-time effort. Successful strategies include consistent follow-up to track the impact of research insights, celebrating wins and positive outcomes resulting from UXR, providing continuous education through workshops and training sessions, and maintaining open feedback channels for stakeholders to share their thoughts on the research process and outputs. 

‍

Our whitepaper findings highlight that organizations fostering strong, long-term relationships between UX researchers and other stakeholders typically demonstrate higher levels of research maturity and seamless integration of UXR into product development processes. This underscores the importance of nurturing these relationships to maximize the value and impact of UX research within the organization. 

‍

By investing in these long-term connections, UX researchers can ensure their insights continue to drive meaningful change and innovation across the company.

‍

Stakeholder integration: the cornerstone of impactful UXR

‍

Stakeholder integration is not just a nice-to-have in UXR—it's a critical factor in demonstrating and maximizing the value of user research. By identifying key stakeholders, engaging them effectively, tailoring communications, and building long-term relationships, UX researchers can ensure that their insights drive meaningful impact across the organization. As we look to the future of UXR, the ability to effectively integrate stakeholders will become even more crucial in our increasingly complex and fast-paced business environment.

‍

Ready to transform your UXR practice and unlock its full potential? 

‍

Optimal Workshop's comprehensive platform is designed to support effective stakeholder integration at every step of the research process. From collaborative planning tools to customizable reporting features, our suite of UXR solutions helps you engage stakeholders, tailor communications, and build lasting relationships that drive innovation. 

‍

Don't let valuable insights go unnoticed or unused—take the first step towards maximizing your UXR impact today. Start your free trial with Optimal Workshop and discover how easy it can be to bridge the gap between user insights and business decision-making, positioning your organization at the forefront of user-centered innovation.

‍

In the rapidly evolving world of user experience research (UXR), demonstrating value and impact has become more crucial than ever. While traditional metrics like Customer Satisfaction (CSAT) scores and Net Promoter Scores (NPS) have long been the go-to measures for UX professionals, they often fall short in capturing the full scope and depth of UXR's impact. As organizations increasingly recognize the strategic importance of user-centered design, it's time to explore more comprehensive and nuanced approaches to measuring UXR's contribution.

‍

Limitations of traditional metrics

‍

CSAT and NPS, while valuable, have significant limitations when it comes to measuring UXR impact. These metrics provide a snapshot of user sentiment but fail to capture the direct influence of research insights on product decisions, business outcomes, or long-term user behavior. Moreover, they can be influenced by factors outside of UXR's control, such as marketing campaigns or competitor actions, making it challenging to isolate the specific impact of research efforts.

‍

Another limitation is the lack of context these metrics provide. They don't offer insights into why users feel a certain way or how specific research-driven improvements contributed to their satisfaction. This absence of depth can lead to misinterpretation of data and missed opportunities for meaningful improvements.

‍

Alternative measurement approaches

‍

To overcome these limitations, UX researchers are exploring alternative approaches to measuring impact. One promising method is the use of proxy measures that more directly tie to research activities. For example, tracking the number of research-driven product improvements implemented or measuring the reduction in customer support tickets related to usability issues can provide more tangible evidence of UXR's impact.

‍

Another approach gaining traction is the integration of qualitative data into impact measurement. By combining quantitative metrics with rich, contextual insights from user interviews and observational studies, researchers can paint a more comprehensive picture of how their work influences user behavior and product success.

‍

Linking UXR to business outcomes

‍

Perhaps the most powerful way to demonstrate UXR's value is by directly connecting research insights to key business outcomes. This requires a deep understanding of organizational goals and close collaboration with stakeholders across functions. For instance, if a key business objective is to increase user retention, UX researchers can focus on identifying drivers of user loyalty and track how research-driven improvements impact retention rates over time.

‍

Risk reduction is another critical area where UXR can demonstrate significant value. By validating product concepts and designs before launch, researchers can help organizations avoid costly mistakes and reputational damage. Tracking the number of potential issues identified and resolved through research can provide a tangible measure of this impact.

‍

Case studies of successful impact measurement

‍

While standardized metrics for UXR impact remain elusive, some organizations have successfully implemented innovative measurement approaches. For example, one technology company developed a "research influence score" that tracks how often research insights are cited in product decision-making processes and the subsequent impact on key performance indicators.

‍

Another case study involves a financial services firm that implemented a "research ROI calculator." This tool estimates the potential cost savings and revenue increases associated with research-driven improvements, providing a clear financial justification for UXR investments.

‍

These case studies highlight the importance of tailoring measurement approaches to the specific context and goals of each organization. By thinking creatively and collaborating closely with stakeholders, UX researchers can develop meaningful ways to quantify their impact and demonstrate the strategic value of their work.

‍

As the field of UXR continues to evolve, so too must our approaches to measuring its impact. By moving beyond traditional metrics and embracing more holistic and business-aligned measurement strategies, we can ensure that the true value of user research is recognized and leveraged to drive organizational success. The future of UXR lies not just in conducting great research, but in effectively communicating its impact and cementing its role as a critical strategic function within modern organizations.

‍

Maximize UXR ROI with Optimal 

‍

While innovative measurement approaches are crucial, having the right tools to conduct and analyze research efficiently is equally important for maximizing UXR's return on investment. This is where the Optimal Workshop platform comes in, offering a comprehensive solution to streamline your UXR efforts and amplify their impact.

‍

The Optimal Platform provides a suite of user-friendly tools designed to support every stage of the research process, from participant recruitment to data analysis and insight sharing. By centralizing your research activities on a single platform, you can significantly reduce the time and resources spent on administrative tasks, allowing your team to focus on generating valuable insights.

‍

Key benefits of using Optimal for improving UXR ROI include:

‍

• Faster research cycles: With automated participant management and data collection tools, you can complete studies more quickly, enabling faster iteration and decision-making.

‍

• Enhanced collaboration: The platform's sharing features make it easy to involve stakeholders throughout the research process, increasing buy-in and ensuring insights are actioned promptly.

‍

• Robust analytics: Advanced data visualization and analysis tools help you uncover deeper insights and communicate them more effectively to decision-makers.

‍

• Scalable research: The platform's user-friendly interface enables non-researchers to conduct basic studies, democratizing research across your organization and increasing its overall impact.

‍

• Comprehensive reporting: Generate professional, insightful reports that clearly demonstrate the value of your research to stakeholders at all levels.

‍

By leveraging the Optimal Workshop, you're not just improving your research processes – you're positioning UXR as a strategic driver of business success. Our platform's capabilities align perfectly with the advanced measurement approaches discussed earlier, enabling you to track research influence, calculate ROI, and demonstrate tangible impact on key business outcomes.

‍

Ready to transform how you measure and communicate the impact of your UX research? Sign up for a free trial of the Optimal platform today and experience firsthand how it can drive your UXR efforts to new heights of efficiency and effectiveness. 

‍

Getting stakeholders aligned and engaged with your research is rarely easy. In fact, it’s typically one of the hardest parts of being a user researcher.

I’ve seen it time and again: researchers pouring their hearts and souls into discovery and analysis projects, only to have leadership teams and different subject matter experts pay little or no attention to the outputs. There is one useful tool for stakeholder alignment, however, and when used correctly it can change how those aforementioned leadership teams and subject matter experts see your research.

Note-taking: A brief recap

The process of note-taking isn’t rocket science – and it’s exactly what it sounds like: Writing observations down during a user interview or other user test in order to identify any useful insights.

In more qualitative forms of research, the note-taking process is essential. It’s how you capture qualitative data. In a card sort, it’s more of an auxiliary exercise that can add another layer of insight.

The core skill with note-taking isn’t necessarily typing, it’s about the note-takers ability to transform observations that they’re making into readable and digestible text. Being a fast typer doesn’t always make for a good note-taker!

This is what makes note-taking an ideal tool for stakeholder engagement. It’s low effort and is an easy way to bring other people into the research process. This is time well spent, as the people who consume the outputs of your research should have an interest in the problems that you’re researching.

3 ways note-taking drives stakeholder engagement

Beyond being a tool to improve stakeholder engagement with your research, the added bonus of getting these people in the room with you as note-takers is that you’re free from the responsibility.

Whether it’s a card sort, user interview or usability test, you can focus on guiding your participants through the various tasks while your stakeholder jots down observations.

Here are 3 ways note-taking can help to drive stakeholder engagement in your research.

1. They get the chance to contribute to your research

Picture this. You’re at the end of your next research project, and you’re standing up at the front of a meeting room alongside a slide deck. It’s time to present your findings back to the original stakeholders of the project. Now consider how much more engaged they’ll be if they also had the opportunity to take part in the note-taking process.

Instead of simply reading your figures and findings, they’ll know exactly where they’ve come from and have a real connection to the data.

2. They can listen to real customers

It’s not often that stakeholders – typically those in leadership positions – get the chance to interact with customers. Usually, they hear about customer experiences second-hand from sales, marketing and customer service teams.

When you bring a stakeholder in as a note-taker, they’re able to hear from customers directly. Being in the room with customers as they try out new features or products is always interesting for those in the higher rungs of an organization.

3. You can generate insights together

Bringing stakeholders into your research sessions as note-takers means you can then collaborate with them to generate findings, thus helping you to reach a consensus quicker. Why does this work? Instead of simply taking a finalized set of findings to your stakeholders, they are with you in the room taking the notes and identifying insights together in the debrief session afterward.

The best tools for note-taking

Forget typing up notes in a document on a laptop – there are a significant number of qualitative note-taking tools available that make the process of note-taking and analysis much easier.

At Optimal Workshop, our tool for this job is Reframer, and it’s a powerful way to improve the qualitative note-taking process. With Reframer, you can log all your notes and observations in one place. After the research session is over, you can make sense of your findings quickly with easy-to-use analysis tools.

Wrap up

You don’t need to bring stakeholders in solely as note-takers. If they’d rather act as passive observers, there’s still immense value in having them in the room with you. Remember: It’s all about getting these people in sync with your research so that they’re better able to see the value of what you do, day to day!

There comes a time in every research project when the actual ‘research’ comes to an end. At this stage, you’ve collated your data and extracted useful insights, and it’s time to take the critical next step: presenting your findings back to your stakeholders.

I remember the first time that I had to present data to stakeholders. My team and I had just run a series of user interviews to learn more about how user researchers seek out and use new learning resources. We’d identified the high-level takeaways and pulled them into a slide deck to take to the leadership team.

Now came the scary part. With the lead researcher on my team, I stood up in front of the group of stakeholders and bumbled my way through the findings. Thankfully, I was with a very capable researcher and we managed to get across all of the important points – but the experience taught me a lot about how to present to stakeholders effectively.

Use stories

One of the most effective techniques that you can use as a presenter is that of the storyteller. Start off by reminding your audience of the status quo, and then reveal the path to a better way of doing things. This sets up a conflict that needs to be resolved.

By establishing this tension, you’re in a better position to persuade your audience to adopt a new viewpoint. Harvard Business Review has a great article from Nancy Duarte that makes for an excellent starting point.

Make it visual

Your findings need to be understandable, not pretty. It’s your job to take everything that you’ve learned, distill it down into the most relevant points for your stakeholders, and then present it in such a way that they’ll be able to take the information on board. A key aspect of success here depends on the visuals.

Here are some key things to keep in mind when it comes to the visual aspects of your presentation:

• Don’t overwhelm your audience with numbers: Use simple formatting, commas and skip unnecessary decimals. Also, right-align columns of numbers so that they form a kind-of bar chart automatically, and your stakeholders can quickly locate the largest numbers.
• Avoid 3D charts (unless they’re the best option): 3D presentation charts are tempting, but they introduce more cognitive load by making people process another element. Of course, there are exceptions.
• Consider something other than the pie chart: Sure, it’s rare that you’ll see a presentation without a pie chart, but they are far from the best option. Why? Because humans aren’t as good at judging the relative differences in circles as opposed to lines. We can much more easily process a bar graph than a pie chart. 

Encourage feedback and questions

You’re not just presenting the findings of your research to inform your stakeholders, you also want agreement. Add to that, this is also a great opportunity to gather more information as well as any feedback.

Don’t be afraid of the Q&A. Ask your stakeholders if they have any questions or feedback on what you’ve just shown them. There are a few ways to do this. You can ask for questions throughout the presentation, at the end, or even send a recap email after the fact to gather written responses. 

Know who you’re talking to

You need to know exactly who you’re presenting to as well as what their priorities and interests are. For example, if you’re speaking to a marketing manager or the leadership team, drill into how your research could impact areas like your free to paid conversion rate, revenue in general or customer churn.

Keep it short, but have more detail available

No one really wants to be sitting in a room listening to a presentation for 2 hours. Try and get all of your key points across within 30 minutes and allot extra time at the end for questions and discussion.

In short, focus on the high-level findings of your research, but have more data available and ready to send out.

Have a TL;DR

It’s a well-known fact that people in upper management positions are often time-poor. That’s why it’s not uncommon to see smartphones and laptops come out in particularly long meetings. If you’re presenting to a group of these people, one of the best ways to give your findings the highest chance of sinking in is through a high-level overview slide, also known as a too long, didn’t read (TL;DR) slide.

The objective of this slide is to give your audience the key takeaways and most important findings. You may also want to insert links to more detailed explanations as well as your suggested next steps.

This is also a great tool for anyone who’s unable to attend your presentation – they’ll know exactly what they’re looking at without having to come to their own conclusions.

Give concrete recommendations

Last, but certainly not least, make sure that no matter what you’re presenting, you have concrete next steps outlined clearly for your audience. For every issue or challenge that you identify, ensure that you have a clear recommendation for how to address that problem. Yes, even if it seems trivial, it’s your job to outline the recommended next steps.

Your stakeholders obviously don’t have to take any of the actions that you propose, but you’re already deep in the problem space and so in the best position to propose further actions. 

Wrap up

Presenting the findings of a research project is an understandably scary undertaking for many researchers – but it shouldn’t be. Remember that you’re there to surface insights to the people that need to hear them, and that this is the best possible way to do so. The last thing you want is for your findings to never see the light of day outside of a shared drive folder.

So remember, focus on creating a useful, interesting presentation that speaks to the people in the room – and don’t be afraid to take questions! Good luck!

We’ve said it once and we’ll certainly say it again: user research is a critical part of the design process. By applying the right research methods to the problems you’re trying to solve, you can pull out fantastic insights which you can use to build products and services that meet the needs of your users.

This won’t be news to any user researchers or designers reading this article – but for those on the marketing side of the organizational fence, it’s time to sit up, take notice, and learn just how valuable user research is. Hint: It’s quite valuable!

Now, thanks to the wealth of information about UX research that’s available online, not to mention the array of tools available, marketers can easily take advantage of powerful research methods to supercharge their marketing campaigns and their user insights.

But, I hear you ask, isn’t ‘user research’ just another term for ‘market research’? Well, not exactly. That’s why we’ll start this article off by exploring the difference between the two.

What’s the difference between market research and user research?

Regardless of organization, profession or field, market research and user research are terms often mixed up or used interchangeably. This comes down mostly to the fact that both terms contain the word ‘research’, but there’s a little more to it.Both market research and user research overlap (check out the diagram below), with a shared focus on things like personas, analytics and competitor analysis. More broadly, user research is seen as a more qualitative approach, whereas market research is typically seen as quantitative. In practice, however, both user researchers and market researchers – at least those doing their jobs correctly – will use a combination of both research approaches.

Looked at another way, market research is typically used to inform sales and marketing (Who will buy what), whereas user research is used to drive product decisions by understanding user needs (What do our users want).

What does this mean for marketers (and researchers?)

Market research, broadly speaking, has always been tied to the bottom line of an organization, and using research as a way to improve revenue lines through an understanding of an organization’s users. Market research seeks the answers to questions such as:

• Who will buy what
• When will they buy it
• What do they look for when buying X product
• Why do they buy X product and not Y product

But this is starting to change. As we’ve seen in the world of design, market research has also undertaken a user-centered shift to try and actually understand the user as opposed to just their intent. There is still a way to go, however. The ESOMAR Global Report from 2017 found that just 15 percent of worldwide spend on market research was qualitative.

As SimpleUsability explains: “The two disciplines co-exist on a moving scale, often overlapping, rather than existing as two polarising variables”.

For marketers (and user researchers to an extent), this really means one thing: focus on the method, not the overarching label. Marketers should take a deep dive into the world of user research and explore all of the methods that researchers utilize on a daily basis:

• Card sorting can show you how your users sort and categorize information, which makes the process of building effective website structures quite simple.
• Diary studies help you to understand long-term user behaviour. Users self-report over a long period of time, keeping a diary about the activity you’re studying.  
• Contextual inquiries let you observe your users in their natural environment, and allow you to ask questions while they go about their business.
• Tree testing lets you test the bare bones structure of your website or mobile app, iterate on the structure, and then test it again.

These are just a few of the methods popular among user researchers – but there are many, many more. Check out the chart below from Christian Rohrer (via Nielsen Norman Group).

How can marketers get started with user research?

Any journey into the world of UX research really needs to start with a holistic understanding of the different methods available and an understanding of what each method can tell you. If you haven’t read it before, we highly recommend the Intro to UX guide on our blog. Then, you can dive into detail by reading about different types of testing and research.

What comes next? The world of user research is a very different place now than what it was even 10 years ago. In the past few years, there’s been a surge in the number of powerful remote UX research tools available, with options available for every method and approach. There are card sorting and tree testing tools, tools for contextual inquiries and even tools for running remote user interviews over the internet. Exploring the different options available to you and playing around with different combinations of tools will put you in the best position to run your own research projects – which brings us to our final recommendation.

With an idea of the methods you can use and the tools available online, you’ll want to put together a UX research plan to build up all of the information you currently have as well as the questions you need to answer.

So here we are. The line between user research and market research continues to blur with every passing day as both sides of the organizational fence rally around a common point: Figuring out their users.

User researchers understand the value of leveraging the various methods available to them. The only question is, will you?

Picture this scenario: You're in your local coffee shop and hear a new song. You want to listen to it when you get back to the office. How do you obtain it? If you’re one of the 232 million Spotify users, you’ll simply open the app, search for the song and add it to your playlist. Within seconds, you’ll have the song ready to play whenever and wherever you want.

This new norm of music streaming wasn’t always the status quo. In the early days of the internet, the process of finding music was easy but nowhere nearly as easy as it is now. You’d often still be able to find any song you wanted, but you would need to purchase it individually or as part of an album, download it to your computer and then sync it across to a portable music player like the iPod.

Spotify is a prime example of successful human-centered design. The music service directly addresses the primary pain points with accessing music and building music collections by allowing users to pay a monthly fee and immediately gain access to a significant catalog of the world’s music.

It’s also far from the only example. Take HelloFresh, for example. Founded by Dominik Richter, Thomas Griesel and Jessica Nilsson in 2011, this company delivers a box of ingredients and recipes to your door each week, meaning there’s no need for grocery shopping or thinking about what to cook. It’s a service that addresses a fairly common problem: People struggle to find the time to go out and buy groceries and also create tasty, healthy meals, so the founders addressed both issues.

Both HelloFresh and Spotify are solutions to real user problems. They weren’t born as a result of people sitting in a black box and trying to come up with new products or services. This is the core of human-centered design – identifying something that people have trouble with and then building an appropriate answer.

The origins of human-centered design

But, someone is likely to ask, what’s even the point of human-centered design? Shouldn’t all products and services be designed for the people using them? Well, yes.

Interestingly, while terms like human-centered design and design thinking have become much more popular in recent years, they’re not entirely new methods of design. Designers have been doing this same work for decades, just under a different name: design. Just take one look at some of the products put together by famed industrial designer Dieter Rams (who famously influenced ex-Apple design lead Jony Ive). You can’t look at the product below and say it was designed without the end user in mind.

Why did human-centered design even gain traction as a term? David Howell (a UX designer from Australia) explains that designers often follow Parkinson’s Law, where “work expands so as to fill the time available for its completion”. He notes that designers could always do more (more user research, more ideation, more testing, etc), and that by wrapping everything under a single umbrella (like human-centered design) designers can “speak to their counterparts in business as a process and elevate their standing, getting the coveted seat at the table”.

Human-centered design, for all intents and purposes, is really just a way for designers to package up the important principles intrinsic to good design and sell them to those who may not be sympathetic to exactly why they’re important. At a broader level, the same thinking can be applied to UX as a whole. Good user experience should naturally fall under design, but occasionally a different way of looking at something is necessary to drive the necessary progress.

So human-centered design can really just be thought of as a vehicle to sell the importance of a user-first approach to organizations – that’s useful, but how exactly are you supposed to start? How do you sell something that’s both easily understandable but at the same time quite nebulous? Well, you sell it in the same way you’d sell user research.

How to sell human-centered design

Focus on the product

In the simplest terms, a product designed and built based on user input is going to perform better than one that was assembled based on internal organizational thinking.

When utilized in the right way, taking a human-centered approach to product design leads to products that resonate much more effectively with people. We looked at Spotify at the beginning of this article for a company that’s continuously adopted this practice, but there are countless others. AirBnB, Uber, Pinterest and more all jump to mind. Google and LinkedIn, meanwhile, serve as good examples of the ‘old guard’ that are starting to invest more in the user experience.

Understand the cost-benefit

In 2013, Microsoft was set to unveil the latest version of its Xbox video game console. Up until that point, the company had found significant success in the videogame market. Past versions of the Xbox console had largely performed very well both critically and commercially. With the newest version, however, the company quickly ran into problems.

The new ‘Xbox One’ was announced with several features that attracted scorn from both the target market and the gaming press. The console would, for example, tie both physical and digital purchases to users’ accounts, meaning they wouldn’t be able to sell them on (a popular practice). The console would also need to remain connected to the internet to check these game licenses, likely leading to significant problems for those without reliable internet access. Lastly, Microsoft also stated that users would have to keep an included camera system plugged in at all times otherwise the console wouldn’t function. This led to privacy advocates arguing that the camera system’s data could be used for things like targeted advertising and user surveillance.

Needless to say, after seeing the response from the press and the console’s target market, Microsoft backtracked and eventually released the Xbox One without the always-on requirement, game licensing system or camera connection requirement.

Think of the costs Microsoft likely incurred having to roll back every one of these decisions so late into the product’s development. If you’re able to identify an issue in the research or prototype phase, it’s going to be significantly cheaper to fix here as opposed to 3 years into development with a release on the horizon.

Wrap-up

As the Spotify founders discovered back in back in 2008, taking a human-centered approach to product design can lead to revolutionary products and experiences. It’s not surprising. After all, how can you be expected to build something that people want to use without understanding said people?