September 15, 2026
—
2 min

Optimal is now on the UK Government's G-Cloud 15 framework

We are delighted to announce that Optimal has been named as a supplier on Government Commercial Agency's (GCA) G-Cloud 15 framework, making our full research platform available to public sector teams across central government, local authorities and the NHS.

‍

GCA is the UK's central commercial and procurement organisation, connecting public and private sectors to achieve the best outcomes for the UK and its citizens. GCA uses its commercial expertise to create a simpler procurement experience that redirects valuable resources into essential public services – creating value for the nation.

‍

Optimal is listed under Lot 2b: Software as a Service (SaaS), where public sector buyers can access our UX Research Platform – a self-service, cloud-hosted platform covering usability and prototype testing, interviews, live-site testing, surveys, card sorting, tree testing, first click testing, and built-in participant recruitment.

‍

As a GCA supplier, Optimal can be procured by government teams through the same framework they already use, without new supplier onboarding or a separate tender process. G-Cloud is how the UK public sector buys cloud software, so for research and service teams working under tight timelines and Cloud First policies, being listed removes a step that usually slows things down.

‍

‍

Already a trusted partner across UK government

‍

This isn't Optimal's first time supporting public sector work. Optimal is used by government and public sector teams around the world, including across the UK. 

‍

When the NHS team needed to turn Covid-19 guidance into clear, accessible information at national scale, they turned to Optimal – recruiting 100 research participants within 48 hours and moving from concept to launch in four weeks. The resulting Covid-19 information hub served approximately 80 million visitors at its peak.

‍

That's the kind of pace public sector teams need, and it's what Optimal is built for.

‍

‍

Everything a government research team needs, from discovery to live service

‍

Optimal is an enterprise, end-to-end research platform supporting the full range of UX research and testing methods government teams rely on: usability and prototype testing, interviews, live-site testing, surveys, card sorting, tree testing, first click testing, mixed methods and qualitative insights. Participant recruitment is built in, with access to multiple panel providers to find niche and hard-to-reach audiences – the specific communities, first-time service users and specialist groups that public sector research so often depends on. 

‍

It's everything a government research or service team needs, from early discovery through to live service, in a single platform rather than a patchwork of separate tools.

‍

‍

Security and compliance built in

‍

Optimal complies with the requirements of the Cyber Essentials scheme, the UK government-backed certification that validates foundational security controls across firewalls, secure configuration, access control, malware protection, and patch management. Independently assessed by an IASME-certified assessor and certified across our whole organisation since September 2026, this recognised standard gives our customers, partners, and stakeholders confidence in how we protect our systems and handle their data.

‍

Alongside Cyber Essentials, Optimal holds ISO/IEC 27001 for information security and ISO/IEC 27701 for privacy, and maintains a SOC 2 Type II report on our controls. Data is encrypted in transit and at rest, and our infrastructure is penetration-tested annually by independent auditors. You can review all of our certifications in our security center.

‍

For information governance teams, that means the security review is largely done before the conversation starts.

‍

‍

Find us

‍

Public sector teams can find Optimal’s Digital Marketplace listing, or talk to us directly about working with your team.

‍

Share this article
Author
Optimal
Workshop

Related articles

View all blog articles
Header graphic for the article '2024: A Year of Transformation at Optimal Workshop'
Learn more
1 min read

2024: A Year of Transformation at Optimal Workshop

As we approach the end of 2024, it’s a great time to reflect on the progress we’ve made as a community and at Optimal. This year, Optimal users launched over 100,000 studies with over 1.2 million participants sharing insights to drive better business decisions and experiences.

Here's how we’ve worked to make research more accessible, speed up insight discovery, empower enterprise teams, and grow our platform’s capabilities in 2024.

‍

Democratizing Research

‍

Research for All
Research shouldn’t be limited to specialists or select teams—it should be accessible to everyone. In 2024, we focused on breaking down barriers to user research so that individuals across all divisions and teams can uncover actionable insights. Our tools are built to help anyone make confident, user-centered decisions, and this year, we’ve seen Optimal users from across all different types of teams, including product, marketing, content, research, design, information architecture, and education. We work to make our platform easy to use and learn, ensuring everyone can dive into research without barriers, regardless of their role or experience.

‍

A Milestone Year for UX Maturity
Understanding and improving UX maturity became a key focus for organizations this year. We launched our comprehensive UX Maturity Framework, complete with assessment tools that help teams identify their current state and plot a path forward. To support this journey, we developed detailed playbooks for each maturity level, offering practical guidance for teams looking to level up their UX practice. ‍‍‍

‍

Demonstrating the Value of UX
The conversation around UX value also took center stage in 2024. Our groundbreaking research into quantifying UX impact provided organizations with concrete data to support their UX investments. Through our popular webinar and blog series, we explored different approaches to communicating UX value to stakeholders, giving practitioners the tools they need to advocate for user-centered design.

‍

Accelerating Insight Discovery

‍

Prototype Testing
This year, we introduced Prototype Testing, enabling teams to test designs early and often. Teams can iterate quickly and ensure their ideas resonate with users before committing to development.

Video Recording (Beta)
We added a new feature to Prototype Testing that captures screen, audio and nonverbal cues—such as frustration—providing deeper insights into your users' experiences.

‍

Figma Integration
We also launched Figma integration for First-Click Testing and Prototype Testing, allowing users to connect design prototypes directly to Optimal studies. This integration makes it easier than ever to test, refine, and align designs with user needs—all without leaving Optimal.

‍

AI-Powered Insights
Our AI-Powered Insights help to uncover patterns and themes in qualitative and interview data. By analyzing large datasets, AI helps you discover key trends and accelerate decision-making.

‍

Optimal Recruitment
Recruiting high-quality participants can be a huge hassle and very time-consuming. That’s why we’ve relaunched Optimal Recruitment with expanded profiling capabilities, enhanced quality controls, and full-service support—to let you focus on what matters most: powerful insights to drive better business outcomes

Enabling Enterprise Teams

‍

Workspaces
For organizations with complex structures, we’ve introduced Workspaces and Projects to give admins greater control, improved organization, and increased privacy controls. Whether you're part of a large enterprise or a growing team, these enhancements simplify governance and amplify impact.

‍

Expanding Platform Capabilities in 2025

‍

Looking Ahead
As we head into 2025, our roadmap is packed with exciting features and improvements to make research more accessible, efficient, and impactful. Expect advancements across our platform, including video recording for prototype testing, a brand new survey tool with improved usability, advanced logic, and AI-powered capabilities to meet the evolving needs of teams worldwide. The best is yet to come - stay tuned and see you in 2025!

Header graphic for the article 'When AI Meets UX: How to Navigate the Ethical Tightrope'
Learn more
1 min read

When AI Meets UX: How to Navigate the Ethical Tightrope

As AI takes on a bigger role in product decision-making and user experience design, ethical concerns are becoming more pressing for product teams. From privacy risks to unintended biases and manipulation, AI raises important questions: How do we balance automation with human responsibility? When should AI make decisions, and when should humans stay in control?

‍

These aren't just theoretical questions they have real consequences for users, businesses, and society. A chatbot that misunderstands cultural nuances, a recommendation engine that reinforces harmful stereotypes, or an AI assistant that collects too much personal data can all cause genuine harm while appearing to improve user experience.

‍

‍

‍

The Ethical Challenges of AI

‍

Privacy & Data Ethics

‍

AI needs personal data to work effectively, which raises serious concerns about transparency, consent, and data stewardship:

‍

  • Data Collection Boundaries – What information is reasonable to collect? Just because we can gather certain data doesn't mean we should.
    ‍
  • Informed Consent – Do users really understand how their data powers AI experiences? Traditional privacy policies often don't do the job.
    ‍
  • Data Longevity – How long should AI systems keep user data, and what rights should users have to control or delete this information?
    ‍
  • Unexpected Insights – AI can draw sensitive conclusions about users that they never explicitly shared, creating privacy concerns beyond traditional data collection.

‍

A 2023 study by the Baymard Institute found that 78% of users were uncomfortable with how much personal data was used for personalized experiences once they understood the full extent of the data collection. Yet only 12% felt adequately informed about these practices through standard disclosures.

‍

‍

Bias & Fairness

‍

AI can amplify existing inequalities if it's not carefully designed and tested with diverse users:

‍

  • Representation Gaps – AI trained on limited datasets often performs poorly for underrepresented groups.
    ‍
  • Algorithmic Discrimination – Systems might unintentionally discriminate based on protected characteristics like race, gender, or disability status.
    ‍
  • Performance Disparities – AI-powered interfaces may work well for some users while creating significant barriers for others.
    ‍
  • Reinforcement of Stereotypes – Recommendation systems can reinforce harmful stereotypes or create echo chambers.

‍

Recent research from Stanford's Human-Centered AI Institute revealed that AI-driven interfaces created 2.6 times more usability issues for older adults and 3.2 times more issues for users with disabilities compared to general populations, a gap that often goes undetected without specific testing for these groups.

‍

‍

User Autonomy & Agency

‍

Over-reliance on AI-driven suggestions may limit user freedom and sense of control:

‍

  • Choice Architecture – AI systems can nudge users toward certain decisions, raising questions about manipulation versus assistance.
    ‍
  • Dependency Concerns – As users rely more on AI recommendations, they may lose skills or confidence in making independent judgments.
    ‍
  • Transparency of Influence – Users often don't recognize when their choices are being shaped by algorithms.
    ‍
  • Right to Human Interaction – In critical situations, users may prefer or need human support rather than AI assistance.

‍

A longitudinal study by the University of Amsterdam found that users of AI-powered decision-making tools showed decreased confidence in their own judgment over time, especially in areas where they had limited expertise.

‍

‍

Accessibility & Digital Divide

‍

AI-powered interfaces may create new barriers:

‍

  • Technology Requirements – Advanced AI features often require newer devices or faster internet connections.
    ‍
  • Learning Curves – Novel AI interfaces may be particularly challenging for certain user groups to learn.
    ‍
  • Voice and Language Barriers – Voice-based AI often struggles with accents, dialects, and non-native speakers.
    ‍
  • Cognitive Load – AI that behaves unpredictably can increase cognitive burden for users.

‍

‍

Accountability & Transparency

‍

Who's responsible when AI makes mistakes or causes harm?

‍

  • Explainability – Can users understand why an AI system made a particular recommendation or decision?
    ‍
  • Appeal Mechanisms – Do users have recourse when AI systems make errors?
    ‍
  • Responsibility Attribution – Is it the designer, developer, or organization that bears responsibility for AI outcomes?
    ‍
  • Audit Trails – How can we verify that AI systems are functioning as intended?

‍

‍

How Product Owners Can Champion Ethical AI Through UX

‍

At Optimal, we advocate for research-driven AI development that puts human needs and ethical considerations at the center of the design process. Here's how UX research can help:

‍

User-Centered Testing for AI Systems

‍

AI-powered experiences must be tested with real users to identify potential ethical issues:

‍

  • Longitudinal Studies – Track how AI influences user behavior and autonomy over time.
    ‍
  • Diverse Testing Scenarios – Test AI under various conditions to identify edge cases where ethical issues might emerge.
    ‍
  • Multi-Method Approaches – Combine quantitative metrics with qualitative insights to understand the full impact of AI features.
    ‍
  • Ethical Impact Assessment – Develop frameworks specifically designed to evaluate the ethical dimensions of AI experiences.

‍

‍

Inclusive Research Practices

‍

Ensuring diverse user participation helps prevent bias and ensures AI works for everyone:

‍

  • Representation in Research Panels – Include participants from various demographic groups, ability levels, and socioeconomic backgrounds.
    ‍
  • Contextual Research – Study how AI interfaces perform in real-world environments, not just controlled settings.
    ‍
  • Cultural Sensitivity – Test AI across different cultural contexts to identify potential misalignments.
    ‍
  • Intersectional Analysis – Consider how various aspects of identity might interact to create unique challenges for certain users.

‍

‍

Transparency in AI Decision-Making

‍

UX teams should investigate how users perceive AI-driven recommendations:

‍

  • Mental Model Testing – Do users understand how and why AI is making certain recommendations?
    ‍
  • Disclosure Design – Develop and test effective ways to communicate how AI is using data and making decisions.
    ‍
  • Trust Research – Investigate what factors influence user trust in AI systems and how this affects experience.
    ‍
  • Control Mechanisms – Design and test interfaces that give users appropriate control over AI behavior.

‍

‍

The Path Forward: Responsible Innovation

‍

As AI becomes more sophisticated and pervasive in UX design, the ethical stakes will only increase. However, this doesn't mean we should abandon AI-powered innovations. Instead, we need to embrace responsible innovation that considers ethical implications from the start rather than as an afterthought.

‍

AI should enhance human decision-making, not replace it. Through continuous UX research focused not just on usability but on broader human impact, we can ensure AI-driven experiences remain ethical, inclusive, user-friendly, and truly beneficial.

‍

The most successful AI implementations will be those that augment human capabilities while respecting human autonomy, providing assistance without creating dependency, offering personalization without compromising privacy, and enhancing experiences without reinforcing biases.

‍

‍

‍

A Product Owner's Responsibility: Leading the Charge for Ethical AI

‍

As UX professionals, we have both the opportunity and responsibility to shape how AI is integrated into the products people use daily. This requires us to:

‍

  • Advocate for ethical considerations in product requirements and design processes
    ‍
  • Develop new research methods specifically designed to evaluate AI ethics
    ‍
  • Collaborate across disciplines with data scientists, ethicists, and domain experts
    ‍
  • Educate stakeholders about the importance of ethical AI design
    ‍
  • Amplify diverse perspectives in all stages of AI development

‍

‍

By embracing these responsibilities, we can help ensure that AI serves as a force for positive change in user experience enhancing human capabilities while respecting human values, autonomy, and diversity.

‍

The future of AI in UX isn't just about what's technologically possible; it's about what's ethically responsible. Through thoughtful research, inclusive design practices, and a commitment to human-centered values, we can navigate this complex landscape and create AI experiences that truly benefit everyone.

‍

‍

Learn more
1 min read

Optimal is now on the UK Government's G-Cloud 15 framework

We are delighted to announce that Optimal has been named as a supplier on Government Commercial Agency's (GCA) G-Cloud 15 framework, making our full research platform available to public sector teams across central government, local authorities and the NHS.

‍

GCA is the UK's central commercial and procurement organisation, connecting public and private sectors to achieve the best outcomes for the UK and its citizens. GCA uses its commercial expertise to create a simpler procurement experience that redirects valuable resources into essential public services – creating value for the nation.

‍

Optimal is listed under Lot 2b: Software as a Service (SaaS), where public sector buyers can access our UX Research Platform – a self-service, cloud-hosted platform covering usability and prototype testing, interviews, live-site testing, surveys, card sorting, tree testing, first click testing, and built-in participant recruitment.

‍

As a GCA supplier, Optimal can be procured by government teams through the same framework they already use, without new supplier onboarding or a separate tender process. G-Cloud is how the UK public sector buys cloud software, so for research and service teams working under tight timelines and Cloud First policies, being listed removes a step that usually slows things down.

‍

‍

Already a trusted partner across UK government

‍

This isn't Optimal's first time supporting public sector work. Optimal is used by government and public sector teams around the world, including across the UK. 

‍

When the NHS team needed to turn Covid-19 guidance into clear, accessible information at national scale, they turned to Optimal – recruiting 100 research participants within 48 hours and moving from concept to launch in four weeks. The resulting Covid-19 information hub served approximately 80 million visitors at its peak.

‍

That's the kind of pace public sector teams need, and it's what Optimal is built for.

‍

‍

Everything a government research team needs, from discovery to live service

‍

Optimal is an enterprise, end-to-end research platform supporting the full range of UX research and testing methods government teams rely on: usability and prototype testing, interviews, live-site testing, surveys, card sorting, tree testing, first click testing, mixed methods and qualitative insights. Participant recruitment is built in, with access to multiple panel providers to find niche and hard-to-reach audiences – the specific communities, first-time service users and specialist groups that public sector research so often depends on. 

‍

It's everything a government research or service team needs, from early discovery through to live service, in a single platform rather than a patchwork of separate tools.

‍

‍

Security and compliance built in

‍

Optimal complies with the requirements of the Cyber Essentials scheme, the UK government-backed certification that validates foundational security controls across firewalls, secure configuration, access control, malware protection, and patch management. Independently assessed by an IASME-certified assessor and certified across our whole organisation since September 2026, this recognised standard gives our customers, partners, and stakeholders confidence in how we protect our systems and handle their data.

‍

Alongside Cyber Essentials, Optimal holds ISO/IEC 27001 for information security and ISO/IEC 27701 for privacy, and maintains a SOC 2 Type II report on our controls. Data is encrypted in transit and at rest, and our infrastructure is penetration-tested annually by independent auditors. You can review all of our certifications in our security center.

‍

For information governance teams, that means the security review is largely done before the conversation starts.

‍

‍

Find us

‍

Public sector teams can find Optimal’s Digital Marketplace listing, or talk to us directly about working with your team.

‍

Seeing is believing

Explore our tools and see how Optimal makes gathering insights simple, powerful, and impactful.