Why Choose Optimal over Askable
Teams that switch from Askable to Optimal typically do so for these four reasons:
“Tree testing & card sorting… They’ve helped me validate and restructure site navigation for clients where information architecture was causing drop-offs. The visual outputs are incredibly useful when sharing insights back to stakeholders who don’t want to wade through raw data.”
G2 review, verified user in Computer Software
“Optimal has become more than a tool for us; it’s a trusted partnership with the company that continues to grow."
G2 review, verified user in Government administration
“[Optimal is] Very easy to use. Easy to share. Easy to show to my students how to use it. Easy to get key insights. New features added constantly.”
G2 review, Verified User
“The Optimal support team is fantastic… quick, knowledgeable, and proactive. They’ve saved us hours when running large studies.”
G2 review, Verified User
“Optimal handles both small and large projects with ease… it’s powerful without being complicated.”
G2 review, Verified User
Askable vs Optimal: Key Differences
Platform Scope and Capabilities
Askable: Askable was built around participant recruitment and only recently expanded into unmoderated research. Reviews mention missing depth in this area, limited analytics, no advanced visualizations, and a lack of essential survey functions like conditional logic or branching.
“Askable is great for finding participants, but the research tools feel pretty basic. I often export data elsewhere for analysis.”
Verified G2 Reviewer, UX Researcher
Built for Enterprise Research at Scale
Askable: As research programs grow, teams often outgrow Askable’s capabilities, requiring multiple tools to achieve the same level of testing, analysis, and reporting.
“Feature limitations impact overall usability, it’s great for simple projects, but not enough for complex research.”
Verified G2 Reviewer
Global Reach and Participant Quality
Askable: Askable’s panel has limited ability to support global or multi-market studies. Reviewers also highlight a downward trend in participant quality.
User Experience and Support
Askable: Users report that Askable’s interface can be confusing and that onboarding resources are limited.
Askable vs Optimal: Feature Comparison
When to Choose Each Platform
Summary: Askable or Optimal?
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Askable started as a participant recruitment platform, while Optimal was designed from day one as a UX research and insights solution. Askable helps you source participants; Optimal helps you run, analyze, and scale research across teams, from recruitment to insight reporting. Teams using multiple tools for testing and analysis often consolidate into Optimal to simplify their workflow.
Askable’s panel strength lies in Australia and New Zealand, which makes it good for local studies. Optimal matches that local strength while extending to a global network of 100M+ verified participants across 150+ countries. That means you can start locally and scale globally without changing platforms.
Yes! Optimal supports both panel recruitment and bring-your-own-audience, with no additional cost or platform limitations.
Absolutely. Optimal includes SOC 2 compliance, fraud prevention, global support, and account management. Our Enterprise plan is designed specifically for enterprise research needs.
