A short guide to personas

It requires a certain kind of mind to see beauty in a hamburger bun—Ray Kroc

Maccas. Mickey D’s. The golden arches. Whatever you call it, you know I’m talking about none other than fast-food giant McDonald’s. A survey of 7000 people across six countries 20 years ago by Sponsorship Research International found that more people recognized the golden arches symbol (88%) than the Christian cross (54%). With more than 35,000 restaurants in 118 countries and territories around the world, McDonald’s has come a long way since multi-mixer salesman Ray Kroc happened upon a small fast-food restaurant in 1954.

‍

For an organization of this size and reach, consistency and strong branding are certainly key ingredients in its marketing mix. McDonald’s restaurants all over the world are easily recognised and while the menu does differ slightly between countries, users know what kind of experience to expect. With this in mind, I wondered if the same is true for McDonald’s web presence? How successful is a large organization like McDonald’s at delivering a consistent online user experience tailored to suit diverse audiences worldwide without losing its core meaning? I decided to investigate and gave McDonald’s a good grilling by testing ten of its country-specific websites’ home pages in one Chalkmark study.

‍

Preparation time 🥒

‍

First-click testing reveals the first impressions your users have of your designs. This information is useful in determining whether users are heading down the right path when they first arrive at your site. When considering the best way to measure and compare ten of McDonald’s websites from around the world, I choose first-click testing because I wanted to be able to test the visual designs of each website and I wanted to do it all in one research study.My first job in the setup process was to decide which McDonald’s websites would make the cut.

‍

The approach was to divide the planet up by continent, combined with the requirement that the sites selected be available in my native language (English) in order to interpret the results. I chose: Australia, Canada, Fiji, India, Malaysia, New Zealand, Singapore, South Africa, the UK, and the US. The next task was to figure out how to test this. Ten tasks is ideal for a Chalkmark study, so I made it one task per website; however, determining what those tasks would be was tricky. Serving up the same task for all ten ran the risk of participants tiring of the repetition, but a level of consistency was necessary in order to compare the sites. I decided that all tasks would be different, but tied together with one common theme: burgers.

‍

After all, you don’t win friends with salad.

‍

Launching and sourcing participants 👱🏻👩👩🏻👧👧🏾

‍

When sourcing participants for my research, I often hand the recruitment responsibilities over to Optimal Workshop because it’s super quick and easy; however, this time I decided to do something a bit different. Because McDonald’s is such a large and well-known organization visited by hundreds of millions of people every year, I decided to recruit entirely via Twitter by simply tweeting the link out. Am I three fries short of a happy meal for thinking this would work? Apparently not. In just under a week I had the 30+ completed responses needed to peel back the wrapper on McDonald’s.

‍

Imagine what could have happened if it had been McDonald’s tweeting that out to the burger-loving masses? Ideally when recruiting for a first-click testing study the more participants you can get the more sure you can be of your results, but aiming for 30-50 completed responses will still provide viable results. Conducting user research doesn’t have to be expensive; you can achieve quality results that cut the mustard for free. It’s a great way to connect with your customers, and you could easily reward participants with, say, a burger voucher by redirecting them somewhere after they do the activity—ooh, there’s an idea!

‍

Reading the results menu 🍽️

‍

Interpreting the results from a Chalkmark study is quick and easy.

‍

‍

Everything you need presented under a series of tabs under ‘Analysis’ in the results section of the dashboard:

• Participants: this tab allows you to review details about every participant that started your Chalkmark study and also contains handy filtering options for including, excluding and segmenting.
• Questionnaire: if you included any pre or post study questionnaires, you will find the results here.
• Task Results: this tab provides a detailed statistical overview of each task in your study based on the correct areas as defined by you during setup. This functionality allows you to structure your results and speeds up your analysis time because everything you need to know about each task is contained in one diagram. Chalkmark also allows you to edit and define the correct areas retrospectively, so if you forget or make a mistake you can always fix it.

‍

• Clickmaps: under this tab you will find three different types of visual clickmaps for each task showing you exactly where your participants clicked: heatmaps, grid and selection. Heatmaps show the hotspots of where participants clicked and can be switched to a greyscale view for greater readability and grid maps show a larger block of colour over the sections that were clicked and includes the option to show the individual clicks. The selection map just shows the individual clicks represented by black dots.

‍

‍

What the deep fryer gave me 🍟🎁

‍

McDonald’s tested ridiculously well right across the board in the Chalkmark study. Country by country in alphabetical order, here’s what I discovered:

• Australia: 91% of participants successfully identified where to go to view the different types of chicken burgers
• Canada: all participants in this study correctly identified the first click needed to locate the nutritional information of a cheeseburger
• Fiji: 63% of participants were able to correctly locate information on where McDonald’s sources their beef
• India (West and South India site): Were this the real thing, 88% of participants in this study would have been able to order food for home delivery from the very first click, including the 16% who understood that the menu item ‘Convenience’ connected them to this service
• Malaysia: 94% of participants were able to find out how many beef patties are on a Big Mac
• New Zealand: 91% of participants in this study were able to locate information on the Almighty Angus™ burger from the first click
• Singapore: 66% of participants were able to correctly identify the first click needed to locate the reduced-calorie dinner menu
• South Africa: 94% of participants had no trouble locating the first click that would enable them to learn how burgers are prepared
• UK: 63% of participants in this study correctly identified the first click for locating the Saver Menu
• US: 75% of participants were able to find out if burger buns contain the same chemicals used to make yoga mats based on where their first clicks landed

‍

‍

Three reasons why McDonald’s nailed it 🍔 🚀

‍

This study clearly shows that McDonald’s are kicking serious goals in the online stakes but before we call it quits and go home, let’s look at why that may be the case. Approaching this the way any UXer worth their salt on their fries would, I stuck all the screens together on a wall, broke out the Sharpies and the Tesla Amazing magnetic notes (the best invention since Post-it notes), and embarked on the hunt for patterns and similarities—and wow did I find them!

‍

‍

Navigation pattern use

‍

Across the ten websites, I observed just two distinct navigation patterns: navigation menus at the top and to the left. The sites with a top navigation menu could also be broken down into two further groups: those with three labels (Australia, New Zealand, and Singapore) and those with more than three labels (Fiji, India, Malaysia, and South Africa). Australia and New Zealand shared the exact same labelling of ‘eat’, ‘learn’, and ‘play’ (despite being distinct countries), whereas the others had their own unique labels but with some subject matter crossover; for example, ‘People’ versus ‘Our People’.

‍

Canada, the UK, and the US all had the same look and feel with their left side navigation bar, but each with different labels. All three still had navigation elements at the top of the page, but the main content that the other seven countries had in their top navigation bars was located in that left sidebar.

These patterns ensure that each site is tailored to its unique audience while still maintaining some consistency so that it’s clear they belong to the same entity.

Logo lovin’ it

If there’s one aspect that screams McDonald’s, it’s the iconic golden arches on the logo. Across the ten sites, the logo does vary slightly in size, color, and composition, but it’s always in the same place and the golden arches are always there. Logo consistently is a no-brainer, and in this case McDonald’s clearly recognizes the strengths of its logo and understands which pieces it can add or remove without losing its identity.

Subtle consistencies in the page layouts

Navigation and logo placement weren’t the only connections one can draw from looking at my wall of McDonald’s. There were also some very interesting but subtle similarities in the page layouts. The middle of the page is always used for images and advertising content, including videos and animated GIFs. The US version featured a particularly memorable advertisement for its all-day breakfast menu, complete with animated maple syrup slowly drizzling its way over a stack of hotcakes.

The bottom of the page is consistently used on most sites to house more advertising content in the form of tiles. The sites without the tiles left this space blank.

Familiarity breeds … usability?

Looking at these results, it is quite clear that the same level of consistency and recognition between McDonald’s restaurants is also present between the different country websites. This did make me wonder what role does familiarity play in determining usability? In investigating I found a few interesting articles on the subject. This article by Colleen Roller on UXmatters discusses the connection between cognitive fluency and familiarity, and the impact this has on decision-making. Colleen writes:Because familiarity enables easy mental processing, it feels fluent. So people often equate the feeling of fluency with familiarity. That is, people often infer familiarity when a stimulus feels easy to process. If we’re familiar with an item, we don’t have to think too hard about it and this reduction in performance load can make it feel easier to use. I also found this fascinating read on Smashing Magazine by Charles Hannon that explores why Apple were able to claim ‘You already know how to use it’ when launching the iPad. It’s well worth a look!Oh and about those yoga mats … the answer is yes.

In the field of user research, every method is either qualitative, quantitative – or both. Understandably, there’s some confusion around these 2 approaches and where the different methods are applicable.This article provides a handy breakdown of the different terms and where and why you’d want to use qualitative or quantitative research methods.

‍

Qualitative research

‍

Let’s start with qualitative research, an approach that’s all about the ‘why’. It’s exploratory and not about numbers, instead focusing on reasons, motivations, behaviors and opinions – it’s best at helping you gain insight and delve deep into a particular problem. This type of data typically comes from conversations, interviews and responses to open questions.The real value of qualitative research is in its ability to give you a human perspective on a research question. Unlike quantitative research, this approach will help you understand some of the more intangible factors – things like behaviors, habits and past experiences – whose effects may not always be readily apparent when you’re conducting quantitative research.A qualitative research question could be investigating why people switch between different banks, for example.

‍

When to use qualitative research

‍

Qualitative research is best suited to identifying how people think about problems, how they interact with products and services, and what encourages them to behave a certain way. For example, you could run a study to better understand how people feel about a product they use, or why people have trouble filling out your sign up form. Qualitative research can be very exploratory (e.g., user interviews) as well as more closely tied to evaluating designs (e.g., usability testing).Good qualitative research questions to ask include:

‍

• Why do customers never add items to their wishlist on our website?
• How do new customers find out about our services?
• What are the main reasons people don’t sign up for our newsletter?

‍

How to gather qualitative data

‍

There’s no shortage of methods to gather qualitative data, which commonly takes the form of interview transcripts, notes and audio and video recordings.Here are some of the most widely-used qualitative research methods:

‍

• Usability test – Test a product with people by observing them as they attempt to complete various tasks.
• User interview – Sit down with a user to learn more about their background, motivations and pain points.
• Contextual inquiry – Learn more about your users in their own environment by asking them questions before moving onto an observation activity.
• Focus group – Gather 6 to 10 people for a forum-like session to get feedback on a product.

‍

How many participants will you need?

‍

You don’t often need large numbers of participants for qualitative research, with the average range usually somewhere between 5 to 10 people. You’ll likely require more if you're focusing your work on specific personas, for example, in which case you may need to study 5-10 people for each persona.While this may seem quite low, consider the research methods you’ll be using. Carrying out large numbers of in-person research sessions requires a significant time investment in terms of planning, actually hosting the sessions and analyzing your findings.

‍

Quantitative research

‍

On the other side of the coin you’ve got quantitative research. This type of research is focused on numbers and measurement, gathering data and being able to transform this information into statistics.Given that quantitative research is all about generating data that can be expressed in numbers, there multiple ways you make use of it. Statistical analysis means you can pull useful facts from your quantitative data, for example trends, demographic information and differences between groups. It’s an excellent way to understand a snapshot of your users.A quantitative research question could involve investigating the number of people that upgrade from a free plan to a paid plan.

‍

When to use quantitative research

‍

Quantitative research is ideal for understanding behaviors and usage. In many cases it's a lot less resource-heavy than qualitative research because you don't need to pay incentives or spend time scheduling sessions etc). With that in mind, you might do some quantitative research early on to better understand the problem space, for example by running a survey on your users.Here are some examples of good quantitative research questions to ask:

‍

• How many customers view our pricing page before making a purchase decision?
• How many customers search versus navigate to find products on our website?
• How often do visitors on our website change their password?

‍

How to gather quantitative data

‍

Commonly, quantitative data takes the form of numbers and statistics.

‍

Here are some of the most popular quantitative research methods:

‍

• Card sorts – Find out how people categorize and sort information on your website.
• First-click tests – See where people click first when tasked with completing an action.
• A/B tests – Compare 2 versions of a design in order to work out which is more effective.
• Clickstream analysis – Analyze aggregate data about website visits.

‍

How many participants will you need?

‍

While you only need a small number of participants for qualitative research, you need significantly more for quantitative research. Quantitative research is all about quantity. With more participants, you can generate more useful and reliable data you can analyze. In turn, you’ll have a clearer understanding of your research problem.This means that quantitative research can often involve gathering data from thousands of participants through an A/B test, or with 30 through a card sort. Read more about the right number of participants to gather for your research.

‍

Mixed methods research

‍

While there are certainly times when you’d only want to focus on qualitative or quantitative data to get answers, there’s significant value in utilizing both methods on the same research projects.Interestingly, there are a number of research methods that will generate both quantitative and qualitative data. Take surveys as an example. A survey could include questions that require written answers from participants as well as questions that require participants to select from multiple choices.

‍

Looking back at the earlier example of how people move from a free plan to a paid plan, applying both research approaches to the question will yield a more robust or holistic answer. You’ll know why people upgrade to the paid plan in addition to how many. You can read more about mixed methods research in this article:

• What is mixed methods research?

‍

Where to from here?

‍

With an understanding of qualitative and quantitative user research, the next best step would be to start learning more about the various methods that fall under each of these research approaches and how to actually conduct research effectively.

‍

Here are some of the best articles to read next:

‍

• How to write great questions for your research – Great research starts with the right questions. Learn how to write effective questions before you start your next project.
• Which comes first: card sorting or tree testing? – Card sorting and tree testing are complementary methods, but which one should you use first?
• How to encourage people to participate in your study – Seemingly one of the hardest parts of conducting research is finding willing participants. It’s actually not that difficult.

In the fast-paced world of product development, risk is an ever-present factor. From potential user dissatisfaction to costly redesigns, the stakes are high. User Experience Research (UXR) plays a crucial role in identifying and mitigating these risks, but quantifying its preventive value can be challenging. Let's explore how UXR contributes to risk mitigation and how we can measure its impact.

‍

Understanding risk in product development 😬

‍

Product development is an exciting yet challenging journey that requires careful navigation of inherent risks. Teams invest significant time and resources into creating solutions they hope will resonate with users, but this process is far from a guaranteed success. When embarking on a new product venture, teams are essentially making an educated guess about what users want and need. This inherent uncertainty brings several considerations, including substantial time investments, allocation of financial and human resources, and the need to adapt to constantly evolving user preferences and competitive landscapes.

‍

The challenge lies in aligning all these elements to create a successful product. Getting it wrong can have significant consequences that extend beyond mere disappointment. Wasted development efforts can result in resources being spent on features or products that don't meet market needs. There's also the potential for negative impact on brand perception if a product misses the mark, potentially affecting how customers view the company as a whole. Furthermore, missed opportunities in the fast-paced world of product development can allow competitors to gain an advantage, affecting a company's market position.

‍

However, there's a powerful tool that can help mitigate these risks: user research. As one industry leader noted in our research, "In periods of change, those who maintain a deep connection with their customers' evolving needs are best positioned to adapt and thrive." This insight highlights a crucial strategy for navigating the uncertain waters of product development.

‍

By prioritizing user research, teams can gain valuable insights that guide their decision-making process. This approach allows them to identify genuine user needs and pain points, potentially uncovering issues that might have been overlooked. It also provides an opportunity to spot potential problems early in the development process, when changes are less costly and easier to implement. Moreover, deep user understanding can uncover opportunities for innovation and differentiation that might not be apparent without this research.

‍

While user research doesn't eliminate all risks associated with product development, it provides a compass that can guide teams through the process with greater confidence. In the dynamic world of product creation, the biggest risk often comes from operating without these user insights. By integrating user research into the development process, teams can navigate uncertainties more effectively and increase their odds of creating products that truly resonate with their target audience.

‍

Successful product development is ultimately about finding the right balance between innovation, user needs, and calculated risk-taking. It's a complex dance of creativity, market understanding, and strategic decision-making. By maintaining a strong connection to user needs and preferences throughout the development process, teams can mitigate risks and increase their chances of success. This user-centric approach not only helps in creating products that meet market demands but also positions companies to adapt and thrive in periods of change and uncertainty.

‍

UXR's role in identifying and mitigating risks 🔎

‍

User experience research plays a crucial role in identifying and mitigating risks throughout the product development process. Acting as an early warning system, UX research helps teams pinpoint potential issues before they evolve into costly problems. This proactive approach allows organizations to make informed decisions and adjustments early in the development cycle, potentially saving significant time and resources.

‍

By engaging with users throughout the development process, researchers gain invaluable insights that can shape the direction of a product. These interactions enable teams to validate product concepts and designs, ensuring that the final output aligns with user expectations and needs. Through various research methodologies, UX researchers can identify usability issues and pain points that might otherwise go unnoticed until after launch. This early detection allows for timely refinements, resulting in a more polished and user-friendly final product.

‍

Our survey findings underscore the value of integrating UX research into the product development process. Organizations that have fully embedded UXR into their workflows demonstrate a superior ability to navigate uncertainties and make user-centered decisions. This integration allows for a more agile and responsive approach to product development, where user feedback and insights directly inform strategic choices.

‍

Download the report

‍

Methodologies for quantifying prevented issues 🧮

‍

In the space of user experience research, one of the most significant yet often overlooked benefits is its ability to prevent issues before they arise. This preemptive approach can save organizations substantial time, resources, and potential reputational damage. However, quantifying the value of something that didn't happen presents a unique challenge. How do you measure the impact of problems avoided? This question has led to the development of various methodologies aimed at quantifying the value of UX research in issue prevention.

‍

1. Issue tracking: Keep a detailed log of potential issues identified through research. Categorize them by severity and potential impact.

‍

2. Cost estimation: Work with product and engineering teams to estimate the cost of addressing issues at different stages of development. Compare this to the cost of conducting research.

‍

3. A/B Testing: Use controlled experiments to compare the performance of research-informed designs against alternatives.

‍

4. Predictive modeling: Develop models that estimate the potential impact of issues on key metrics like user retention or conversion rates.

‍

5. Historical comparison: Analyze past projects where research was not conducted and compare their outcomes to research-informed projects.

‍

One effective approach is to use a research ROI calculator that estimates potential cost savings and revenue increases associated with research-driven improvements. This provides a clear financial justification for UXR investments.

‍

Communicating preventive value to stakeholders 📢

‍

To effectively communicate the value of risk mitigation through UXR, consider these strategies:

‍

1. Speak the language of business: Frame research findings in terms of business outcomes, such as potential cost savings, revenue impact, or risk reduction.

‍

2. Use visualizations: Create compelling visual representations of prevented issues and their potential impact.

‍

3. Share success stories: Highlight case studies where research prevented significant issues or led to successful outcomes.

‍

4. Involve stakeholders: Engage key decision-makers in the research process to build understanding and buy-in.

‍

5. Provide ongoing updates: Regularly communicate how research insights are influencing decisions and mitigating risks throughout the development process.

‍

Remember, as one research manager in our study observed, "When I hear that a company is downsizing, I immediately wonder how it will affect their research capabilities."

‍

This highlights the importance of consistently demonstrating the value of UXR in risk mitigation.

‍

By quantifying and communicating the preventive value of UX research, we can shift the perception of UXR from a cost center to a critical investment in risk mitigation and product success. As the field continues to evolve, developing robust methodologies for measuring this preventive value will be key to securing resources and support for UXR initiatives.

‍

Ultimately, the goal is to create a culture where user research is seen as an essential safeguard against costly mistakes and a driver of informed, user-centered decision-making. By doing so, organizations can navigate the uncertainties of product development with greater confidence and success.

‍

DOWNLOAD THE FULL REPORT

‍

Maximize your risk mitigation efforts with Optimal 👩🏻🚒

‍

Ready to elevate your UX research and risk mitigation strategies? Optimal Workshop's comprehensive platform offers powerful tools to streamline your research process, from participant recruitment to data analysis. Our suite of user-friendly solutions enables you to conduct more efficient studies, uncover deeper insights, and effectively communicate the preventive value of your research to stakeholders. 

‍

With Optimal, you can quantify your risk mitigation efforts more accurately and demonstrate the ROI of UXR with greater clarity. Don't let potential risks threaten your product's success. 

‍

Try Optimal Workshop today and transform your approach to UX research and risk prevention. 

‍