7 Alternatives to Maze for User Testing & Research (Better Options for Reliable Insights)

‍

UX and product teams struggle with fragmented workflows when using traditional survey-only platforms like SurveyMonkey. Teams end up juggling multiple tools for surveys, usability testing, information architecture, and participant recruitment, creating data silos and ballooning costs.

‍

‍

Optimal unifies the entire UX research workflow in a single platform with unlimited seats, integrated recruitment, and purpose-built UX tools.

‍

Beyond Surveys: Complete UX Research vs Single-Method Tool

‍

SurveyMonkey does one thing well: Surveys.  It's built for market research, employee feedback and event registrations. But most UX teams need additional methods to complete their research including: card sorting, tree testing, prototype testing, and usability studies. SurveyMonkey offers none of these, forcing you to purchase additional platforms.

‍

Optimal provides the complete UX toolkit. Surveys, card sorting,  tree testing, first-click testing,  prototype testing, and interviews, all in one platform with integrated analysis.

‍

17 years of UX expertise. Optimal isn't a generic survey tool adapted for research. Every feature is purpose-built for understanding user behavior and optimizing digital experiences, proven by companies like Netflix and Uber.

‍

Per-Seat Pricing vs Unlimited Seats

‍

SurveyMonkey's per-seat model creates scaling challenges. Every new team member who needs research access means another line item in your budget. As your research practice matures and more people across product, design, and marketing want to run studies, costs multiply. 

‍

Optimal's unlimited seat model changes the economics. Pay for usage, not headcount. Whether you have 5 researchers or 50 people conducting studies across product, design, and marketing teams, the cost stays the same. No budget negotiations when a new PM wants to run a study. No choosing between cost and collaboration.

‍

Hidden costs multiply with seat-based pricing. Beyond per-user fees, SurveyMonkey charges for responses beyond plan limits. A growing team means higher seat costs AND higher overage fees as research scales.

‍

Unlimited seats enable research democratization. When anyone can conduct research without impacting the budget, UX thinking spreads across your organization, without procurement approvals for each new seat.

‍

Participant Recruitment: Built-In vs Bring Your Own

‍

SurveyMonkey requires DIY recruitment. You get distribution tools (email, links, QR codes) but no participants. You must build your own panel or purchase SurveyMonkey Audience separately, with additional per-response fees that vary by audience type.

‍

Launch research in minutes with Optimal. Design your study, specify demographics, and recruit qualified participants immediately. No vendor coordination, no delays, no managing multiple relationships.

‍

Quality and reach matter. Optimal's recruitment includes quality checks and access to niche audiences (healthcare professionals, developers, executives) that require expensive custom recruitment through SurveyMonkey.

‍

Fully Managed or DIY Recruitment: Flexibility to Suit Your Needs. Optimal offers fully managed recruitment as well as DIY recruitment and an on-demand panel. Whether you prefer hands-on control or a completely managed process, we have you covered. With Managed Recruitment, our dedicated in-house team handles everything from briefing to delivery. The team sources from a global pool of vetted participants across multiple trusted providers and selects the panel to ensure that you can quickly connect with your target users. Need to refine targeting mid-project? No problem. We’ll refine your criteria seamlessly to keep your study on track, no matter the changes.With SurveyMonkey, you’re left to build your own panel or purchase SurveyMonkey Audience separately, with extra per-response fees based on audience type, which can quickly escalate costs.

‍

Advanced Targeting: Precision Recruitment for Your Exact Needs. At Optimal, we empower you with the ability to recruit precisely the audience you need, even for niche or hard-to-reach groups. Unlike SurveyMonkey Audience, where targeting is limited to preset criteria, Optimal Managed Recruitment gives you the flexibility to create custom, free-form targeting criteria. Whether you're seeking healthcare professionals, developers, or executives, we’ll ensure you get the exact participants required to deliver actionable insights.

‍

Transparent, All-Inclusive Pricing: No Hidden Fees, No Surprises. Optimal has no hidden recruitment fees or per-question charges. The cost of recruitment is all-inclusive, with no additional costs for screening questions or response limits. By contrast, pricing can quickly add up with SurveyMonkey’s additional costs for screening questions, question types, and length of surveys. As an example, for matrix/scale questions, each row of a question counts as a separate question, increasing the overall cost.

‍

Optimize Your Screeners: Expert Support for Better Results. Optimal's Managed Recruitment helps you optimize your screeners for free. Our team ensures that your screeners filter participants effectively and can even help you write them if needed. We optimize for quality and feasibility, ensuring the best-fit participants.

‍

Why Choose Optimal? 

‍

SurveyMonkey excels as a general-purpose survey platform, but UX and product teams quickly hit its limits. Per-user pricing and panel recruitment costs scales expensively, there are no UX-specific research methods, and recruitment requires separate coordination.

‍

Optimal delivers more value for less:

‍

• Unlimited seats vs per-user fees 
• Fully Managed or DIY Recruitment flexible options to meet your needs
• Complete UX toolkit including surveys, usability testing, card sorting, and more
• Purpose-built for UX with 17 years of research expertise

‍

For teams serious about understanding users and building better products, Optimal eliminates workflow complexity while providing significantly more capability per dollar.

‍

Ready to see the difference? Start your free trial.

‍

When evaluating tools for user testing and participant recruitment, Askable often appears on the shortlist, especially for teams based in Australia and New Zealand. But in 2025, many researchers are finding Askable’s limitations increasingly difficult to work around: restricted study volume, inconsistent participant quality, and new pricing that limits flexibility.

‍

If you’re exploring Askable alternatives that offer more scalability, higher data quality, and global reach, here are five strong options.

‍

‍

1. Optimal: Best Overall Alternative for Scalable, AI-Powered Research 

‍

Optimal is a comprehensive user insights platform supporting the full research lifecycle, from participant recruitment to analysis and reporting. Unlike Askable, which has historically focused on recruitment, Optimal unifies multiple research methods in one platform, including prototype testing, card sorting, tree testing, and AI-assisted interviews.

‍

Why teams switch from Askable to Optimal

‍

1. You can only run one study at a time in Askable

‍Optimal removes that bottleneck, letting you launch multiple concurrent studies across teams and research methods.

2. Askable’s new pricing limits flexibility 

Optimal offers scalable plans with unlimited seats, so teams only pay for what they need.

3. Askable’s participant quality has dropped

Optimal provides access to over 100+ million verified participants worldwide, with strong fraud-prevention and screening systems that eliminate low-effort or AI-assisted responses.

‍

Additional advantages

‍

• End-to-end research tools in one workspace
• AI-powered insight generation that tags and summarizes automatically
• Enterprise-grade reliability with decade-long market trust
• Dedicated onboarding and SLA-backed support
  
  

‍

Best for: Teams seeking an enterprise-ready, scalable research platform that eliminates the operational constraints of Askable.

‍

‍

‍

2. UserTesting: Best for Video-Based Moderated Studies

‍

‍UserTesting remains one of the most established platforms for moderated and unmoderated usability testing. It excels at gathering video feedback from participants in real time.

‍

Pros:

• Large participant pool with strong demographic filters
• Supports moderated sessions and live interviews
• Integrations with design tools like Figma and Miro

‍

Cons:

• Higher cost at enterprise scale
• Less flexible for survey-driven or unmoderated studies compared with Optimal
• The UI has become increasingly complex and buggy as UserTesting has been expanding their platform through acquisitions such as UserZoom and Validately.
  ‍

‍

Best for: Companies prioritizing live, moderated usability sessions.

‍

‍

‍

3. Maze: Best for Product Teams Using Figma Prototypes

‍

‍Maze offers seamless Figma integration and focuses on automating prototype-testing workflows for product and design teams.

‍

‍

Pros:

• Excellent Figma and Adobe XD integration
• Automated reporting
• Good fit for early-stage design validation

‍

Cons:

• Limited depth for qualitative research
• Smaller participant pool
  
  

‍

Best for: Design-first teams validating prototypes and navigation flows.

‍

‍

‍

4. Lyssna (formerly UsabilityHub): Best for Fast Design Feedback

‍

‍Lyssna focuses on quick-turn, unmoderated studies such as preference tests, first-click tests, and five-second tests.

‍

Pros:

• Fast turnaround
• Simple, intuitive interface
• Affordable for smaller teams

‍

Cons:

• Limited participant targeting options
• Narrower study types than Askable

‍

Best for: Designers and researchers running lightweight validation tests.

‍

‍

‍

5. Dovetail: Best for Research Repository and Analysis

‍

‍‍Dovetail is primarily a qualitative data repository rather than a testing platform. It’s useful for centralizing and analyzing insights from research studies conducted elsewhere.

‍

Pros:

• Strong tagging and note-taking features
• Centralized research hub for large teams

‍

Cons:

• Doesn’t recruit participants or run studies
• Requires manual uploads from other tools like Askable or UserTesting
  
  

‍

Best for: Research teams centralizing insights from multiple sources.

‍

‍

‍

Final Thoughts on Alternatives to Askable

‍

If your goal is simply to recruit local participants, Askable can still meet basic needs. But if you’re looking to scale research in your organization, integrate testing and analysis, and automate insights, Optimal stands out as the best long-term investment. Its blend of global reach, AI-powered analysis, and proven enterprise support makes it the natural next step for growing research teams. You can try Optimal for free here.

‍

In today's digital landscape, delivering exceptional user experiences is no longer optional – it's essential for success. At Optimal, we're committed to empowering UX professionals and organizations with the best-in-class tools and methodologies to create outstanding digital products and experiences. 

‍

In this blog post, we'll explore practical use cases that demonstrate how Optimal's research platform can drive meaningful improvements across various UX scenarios.

‍

‍

Use case 1: Make Collaborative Design Decisions or A/B Test a Design

‍

Refining an existing product? Launching a new website? Rebranding? Optimal's user research platform empowers your team to make informed, collaborative decisions. Here's how to leverage our tools for impactful results:

‍

1. Qualitative Insights: Establish organizational priorities

‍

• Use Qualitative Insights to develop a comprehensive list of top tasks or goals from your organization's perspective.
• Engage stakeholders across departments to ensure alignment on key objectives.

‍

2. Surveys: Validate user priorities and pain points

‍

• Deploy a targeted survey to confirm users' top tasks and identify existing issues.
• Gather quantitative data to support or challenge organizational assumptions about user needs.

‍

3. First-click Testing: Conduct preference testing

‍

• Use First-Click Testing to evaluate the effectiveness of different design options.
• This method provides valuable insights for A/B testing decisions, ensuring designs resonate with your target audience.

‍

4. Qualitative Insights: Deep dive into user preferences

‍

• Conduct follow-up interviews or focus groups using our Qualitative Insights to gain a deeper understanding of user preferences and experiences with different design options.
• Explore the 'why' behind user choices to inform more nuanced design decisions.

‍

5. Prototype Testing: Validate interaction flows and usability

‍

• Use Prototype Testing to observe how users interact with early-stage designs.
• Test navigation, UI components, and task flows to ensure your prototypes align with user expectations—before costly development begins.

‍

6. Interviews: Capture rich, contextual feedback

‍

• Conduct live, moderated Interviews directly within Optimal to explore user reactions and behaviors.
• Use screen recordings and notes to uncover deeper insights behind user choices and refine design decisions with confidence.

‍

By embedding user insights at every stage, your team can confidently design experiences that don’t just look good but work for real people. Optimal empowers you to make faster, more informed decisions that drive meaningful outcomes across your organization.

‍

‍

Use case 2: Developing effective content strategies

‍

Developing a robust content strategy is crucial for intranets, help documents, websites, and product copy. Optimal's user research and insights platform empowers you to create content that resonates with your audience and drives engagement. Here's how to leverage our tools for effective content strategy development:

‍

1. Card Sorting: Organize content intuitively

‍

• Use Card Sorting to understand how users naturally categorize and group your content.
• Gain insights into users' mental models to inform your content hierarchy and organization.
• Apply findings to create a content structure that aligns with user expectations, enhancing findability and engagement.

‍

2. Tree Testing: Validate information architecture

‍

• Employ Tree Testing to confirm whether information placed within your proposed hierarchy is findable and understandable.
• Identify areas where users struggle to locate content, enabling you to refine your structure for optimal user experience.
• Iterate on your information architecture based on concrete user data, ensuring your content is easily accessible.
• Test different content structures and then compare them with each other using the task comparison tool available in Optimal to understand which structure is most likely to drive users to perform the targeted actions.

‍

3. Qualitative Insights: Analyze language perceptions

‍

• Leverage Qualitative Insights to conduct in-depth interviews or focus groups.
• Explore user perceptions of terminology, language style, and content tone.
• Gather rich insights to inform your content voice and style guide, ensuring your messaging resonates with your target audience.

‍

4. Additional Applications of Qualitative Insights

‍

   Expand your content strategy research by using Qualitative Insights to:

• Review internal tools and processes to streamline content creation workflows.
• Compare content experiences across desktop and mobile devices for consistency.
• Gather event feedback to inform content for future marketing materials.
• Analyze customer service and support interactions to identify common issues and FAQs.
• Conduct usability testing on existing content to identify areas for improvement.

‍

   Key questions to explore:

‍

• What's working well in your current content?
• What's not resonating with users?
• What are users' first impressions of your content?
• How do users typically interact with your content?
• How well does your content foster empathy and connection with your audience?

‍

By systematically applying these research methods, you'll develop a content strategy that not only meets your organizational goals but also deeply resonates with your audience. Remember, content strategy is an ongoing process. Regularly use Optimal's tools to assess the effectiveness of your content, gather user feedback, and iteratively improve your approach for continued success.

‍

‍

Use case 3: Increase website conversion

‍

Empower your team to boost conversion rates by leveraging Optimal's best-in-class user research and insights platform. Here's how you can unlock meaningful improvements:

‍

1. Qualitative Insights & Surveys: Uncover user motivations

‍

• Conduct in-depth interviews or targeted surveys to gather rich, qualitative feedback about user experiences, motivations, and pain points on your site.
• Add an intercept snippet to your existing website to survey users as they come to your website to get a clear understanding of user motivations in context.
• Analyze responses to identify key themes and opportunities for optimization.

‍

2. Tree Testing: Optimize navigation structure

‍

• Use our Tree Testing tool to evaluate the effectiveness of your site's navigation structure.
• Identify areas where users struggle to find information, enabling you to streamline pathways to conversion.

‍

3. Card Sorting: Enhance information architecture

‍

• Leverage Card Sorting tool to understand how users naturally categorize your site's information.
• Apply insights to refine the layout of product features or benefits on your landing pages, aligning with user expectations.

‍

4. Prototype Testing: Validate Design Changes

‍

• Develop prototypes of new landing pages or key conversion elements (like CTAs) using our Prototype Testing tool.
• Conduct first-click tests to ensure your design changes resonate with users and drive desired actions.

‍

5. Follow-up Qualitative Insights: Iterate and improve

‍

• After implementing changes, conduct follow-up interviews or surveys to gauge the impact of your optimizations.
• Gather feedback on the improved user experience and identify any remaining pain points.

‍

By systematically applying these research methods, you'll gain the actionable insights needed to create a more intuitive, engaging, and conversion-friendly website. Optimal empowers you to make data-driven decisions that not only boost conversions but also enhance overall user satisfaction.

‍

‍

Embracing mixed methods research

‍

To truly unlock the power of user research, we recommend a mixed methods approach. By combining quantitative data from surveys and usability tests with qualitative insights from interviews and open-ended responses, you can gain a comprehensive understanding of your users' needs and behaviors.

‍

For more information on mixed methods research and how it can enhance your UX strategy, check out our detailed guide: What is mixed methods research?

‍

‍

And that’s a wrap

‍

Optimal's user research and insights platform provides the tools and methodologies you need to deliver exceptional digital experiences. By leveraging these use cases and adopting a mixed methods approach, you can make data-driven decisions that resonate with your users and drive business success.

‍

Remember, great UX is an ongoing journey. Regularly employ these research methods to stay attuned to your users' evolving needs and preferences. With Optimal as your partner, you're equipped to create digital products and experiences that truly stand out in today's competitive landscape.

‍

Ready to elevate your UX research? Explore Optimal's platform and start unlocking actionable insights today!