August 16, 2026
5 minutes

The Next Evolution of Optimal Recruitment: More Control. More Precision. More Confidence.

When we spoke to study creators about what can cause a study to fail, the answer was rarely a methodology problem. It was recruitment.

If you've ever watched a study stall because the right participants didn't show up, you already know the problem we're trying to solve. The study is ready. The tasks are written. Stakeholders are waiting. And then recruitment breaks down. 

Participants trickle in too slowly. The participant quality isn’t quite right. The timeline shifts. Confidence in the findings edges downward.

Recruitment: a moving target

Recruitment has always been a moving target. There are endless ways to improve it – through reach, participant quality, fraud prevention, and ease of use. 

As part of our ongoing work to strengthen our recruitment offering, we’ve reimagined self-service recruitment at Optimal. We’ve taken a closer look at the experience and focused on giving research teams more options, greater control, and confidence in participant quality when recruiting participants.

What we heard from research teams

Across the teams we spoke to, several consistent themes emerged. Quality was a persistent concern. The issues were usually about fit. Participants sometimes didn’t meaningfully engage with the tasks or dropped off mid-session. 

"Niche" participants were referenced often as well. What was usually meant wasn't rare profiles but it was a combination of specific targeting and filters applied at once. Seniority plus industry plus behaviour plus location. Multiple criteria that some existing tools just didn't handle well.

On the coordination side, we heard a consistent ask: researchers want to know who they've already spoken to. They don't want to contact the same people repeatedly without realizing it. They're tired of managing participant lists manually just to avoid that problem.

In short: speed matters, but predictability, visibility, and participant quality matter more.

Built for real-world studies

We've rebuilt Optimal’s self-service recruitment from the ground up.

Participant Profiles: more flexibility and control

The centerpiece of the new experience is Participant Profiles. Build a profile for exactly who you need from demographics, location (down to the city), job title, seniority, company size, device, industry, B2B, language, and more. You’ll also have the ability to:

  • Run multiple profiles in a single study. If you need senior decision-makers from the UK and individual contributors from the US, you can define both profiles with separate quotas and recruit them simultaneously for the same study.

  • Set multiple quotas per profile. Define not just who you need, but how many of each. So if your study needs 30 brand managers and 20 operations managers, you can recruit for both.

  • Set exclusion controls. One of the clearest things we heard: researchers don't want to keep recruiting the same people. It can create a bias in their data, but managing participant history manually can be resource-intensive and tedious. Exclusion controls let you automatically exclude participants who've taken part in your studies within a set period; for example, the last three months.

More panels, more reach

To help research teams reach the right participants with greater reliability, Optimal’s self-service recruitment now draws from multiple panels. This increases the pool of available participants across regions and segments, giving research teams more opportunities to find the right fit even for more specific or multi-criteria profiles.

Access millions of participants across over 150 countries, with expanded targeting options beyond general population samples, including B2B audiences.

Visibility and predictability, from setup to launch

Before you launch, you'll see an estimated fill time, credit cost, and a feasibility check based on your profile and quotas. After launch, live recruitment progress sits alongside your study responses. You can see exactly how each profile quota is filling in real time.

Why this matters now

The teams we spoke to are running more ambitious studies than ever – recorded sessions, concept tests, and studies that sit between a quick survey and a full moderated interview. These studies demand reliable, targeted, well-matched participants. Recruitment is often the deciding factor in whether a study succeeds.

Recruitment has always been the part of research that feels the least in your control. We want to change that, not adding more complexity, but by giving you the right tools to recruit exactly who you need.

You should be able to see what's happening, trust that the right people are coming through, and stay focused on your study. Get the confidence in your participants so you can focus on what comes next: the decisions that matter.

Profiles are now available in Optimal’s Usability Testing tool and will be rolling out across the rest of the platform.

Explore the new recruitment experience in your account or book a demo.

Share this article
Author
Optimal
Workshop

Related articles

View all blog articles
Header graphic for the article 'From Interview Insights to Action: Using AI Chat to Deliver...'
Learn more
1 min read

From Interview Insights to Action: Using AI Chat to Deliver Findings into Notion, Jira, Linear, and Confluence

User interviews provide some of the richest insights a product team can uncover. But turning hours of recordings and transcripts into clear insights can often be slow and manual without the right tools.

With automated insights and AI Chat in Optimal Interviews, you can accelerate that entire workflow, from extracting insights from interview recordings to transforming them into outputs that fit directly into the tools your team already works in.

Instead of spending hours summarizing transcripts and translating research into stakeholder updates, AI Chat helps you quickly generate structured outputs for documentation, tickets, and decision-making.

Deliver Interview Insights Directly into the Tools Your Team Uses

AI Chat can surface key themes, quotes, and patterns across participant recordings. Once insights are identified, it can quickly transform them into formats your team already uses.

You can control the output by specifying tone, length, structure, and level of detail directly in your prompt. The more explicit you are about the format you want, the better the output.

Simply specify the details of the deliverable you want, and AI Chat can structure the output for documentation, planning, and product tools.

Here’s how teams can use AI Chat with some of the most common product, design, and research tools.

Notion

Notion is used by many teams for documentation, knowledge bases, product planning, and research repositories.

Example AI Chat prompts

  • Turn these interview insights into a structured Notion research summary with sections for Key Findings, Supporting Quotes, and Recommendations.
  • Create a Notion page outline summarizing onboarding interview insights with headings and bullet points.

Jira

Jira is a widely used issue tracking and project management platform that product and engineering teams rely on to manage work, track bugs, and plan development tasks.

Research insights often lead directly to product improvements, and AI Chat can translate insights into actionable tickets.

Example AI Chat prompts

  • Convert these interview insights into three Jira tickets including title, description, and acceptance criteria.
  • Turn this usability issue into a Jira bug ticket.
  • Create a Jira epic summarizing onboarding improvements suggested by interview feedback.

Linear

Linear is a modern planning and issue tracking tool designed for fast-moving product teams. It’s often used for planning product work, managing projects and engineering tasks, and tracking product improvements.

AI Chat can quickly convert insights into structured Linear issues.

Example AI Chat prompts

  • Convert these insights into Linear.app issues with clear titles, descriptions, and priority levels.
  • Create a Linear.app issue summarizing the navigation problem identified in these interviews.
  • Generate a set of tasks for the Linear.app addressing usability problems mentioned by participants.

Confluence

Confluence is a team collaboration and documentation platform used to share knowledge, publish research reports, and maintain internal documentation.

AI Chat can help transform research findings into polished documentation ready for stakeholders.

Example AI Chat prompts

  • Turn these interview insights into a Confluence page with sections for Background, Findings, and Recommendations.
  • Create a Confluence page explaining the usability issues uncovered in onboarding research.
  • Turn opportunities to improve into concise post-it notes, with one key point per note, written in simple, scannable language to use in a Confluence whiteboard.

Best practice tip: For cleaner, copy-and-paste-ready outputs, consider adding “Do not include citations.” to any of these suggested prompts.


Accelerate the Impact of User Research

By combining automated interview insights with AI Chat, teams can quickly move from recordings to structured insights, and share them in formats that resonate with internal teams and stakeholders.

This makes it easier to clearly communicate what users are saying, build alignment across product, design, and engineering, get buy-in, and turn research insights into decisions that teams are ready to support and action.

Learn more
1 min read

The Future of AI-Powered Research Is Here: Introducing Optimal's Model Context Protocol (MCP)

Nearly 18 years ago, Optimal helped define what UX research could be, pioneering practices and tools that would become industry standard and change how teams worldwide better understand their users. As the industry has evolved, so has Optimal, expanding the platform, advancing participant recruitment, and building Optimal Intelligence AI to accelerate insight to action.

Now, we’re at the edge of another major shift. With the launch of the Model Context Protocol (MCP), we’re entering a new realm, moving from traditional research workflows to AI-powered intelligence.

What is MCP (Model Context Protocol)?


Research data is one of the most valuable assets in any organization, but until now, it has been scattered across studies and reports, time-consuming to search and synthesize, and different to search or reuse. MCP now changes that for research teams. 

Model Context Protocol (MCP) enables you to connect your Optimal research directly to AI tools, like ChatGPT, Claude, or Cursor, to explore and analyze your data seamlessly. Insights can go beyond data downloads, dashboards, or static reports. Access your insights and explore further with natural conversation.

Get instant insights for questions like: 

  • “Based on all the research I’ve run in Optimal, what are the biggest UX opportunities for our product?” 
  • “What usability issues have been identified by studies conducted in the past 3 months?”
  • “What themes appear across onboarding studies?”
  • “What research already exists about navigation improvements?”

What MCP Unlocks (Beyond Search)


With MCP-connected tools, you can:

  • Analyze studies: Understand patterns, findings, and trends across research automatically.
  • Cross-study synthesis: Identify recurring themes across multiple studies in seconds.
  • Pull key insights: Extract findings from individual studies without manual review.
  • Search & explore research: Filter studies by creator, title, participant group, or timeframe.
  • Analyze transcript insights & sessions: Surface usability issues, pain points, and behavioral patterns.
  • Turn insights into deliverables: Automatically format findings into summaries and stakeholder-ready outputs. Get more ideas here.
  • Connect with other tools & workflows: Use MCP along with your AI tool's existing integrations to create alerts and automate next steps e.g. create a Slack notification when a participant completes a study, share milestones, create a JIRA ticket and follow-up tasks.

From Early UX Research to AI-Native Intelligence


The evolution is clear.


We started by helping teams understand users through early UX research methods.
We helped formalize how research is conducted, analyzed, and shared.

And now, with MCP in Optimal, we’re helping teams move beyond analysis altogether toward conversational, AI-driven research intelligence.

Log in to Optimal, connect with your AI tools, and get the most value from your research or book a demo to start building your research repository with Optimal.

Learn more
1 min read

Frequently Asked Questions about Optimal’s New Mixed-Methods Usability Testing Tool

We recently hosted a live webinar introducing Optimal's new Usability Testing tool, a powerful solution that brings multiple research methods together in a single study, helping you get better insights, faster.

Looking for the highlights? We've rounded up answers to the most common questions from the session.

What is Usability Testing?

Optimal's new Usability Testing tool is a mixed-methods research tool that brings Prototype Testing, Live Site Testing, and Surveys into a single, end-to-end study workflow. Instead of treating each method as its own initiative, you can combine them inside a single study to allow participants to move naturally between tasks, experiences, and questions.

With this tool, you can compare multiple prototypes side by side, benchmark a current live experience against a redesigned concept, evaluate a competitor's experience, and more. And researchers get everything analyzed in one place with AI-powered summaries, task results, video clips, and evidence-backed insights surfaced automatically.

Is Usability Testing supported for mobile testing?

Yes, participants can complete Usability Testing studies on mobile devices using their mobile browser or the Optimal Participant App. If screen recording is required, participants are prompted to download the Optimal Participant App, available for both iOS and Android. 

Do you have to use multiple methods, or can you run just one?

You can keep it simple and run a single survey, a standalone prototype test, or a live site session on its own. Or, mix methods or run multiple of the same method, such as multiple prototypes or live website tests in one study. The tool supports however your study needs to be shaped.

Can you run bilingual studies?

Usability Testing currently supports over 30 languages enabling what participants see and guiding how AI models interpret responses, generate summaries, identify themes, and surface insights. Today, studies are configured around a single language, so participants are expected to respond in the chosen language. That said, multilingual study support is something we're exploring for our roadmap.

Are participants recruited once across all methods, or separately for each?

Just once. From the participant's perspective, this looks and feels like a single study regardless of how many methods are included. They move through the experience naturally from start to finish.

To what extent can sections and questions be randomized?

Section-level randomization shuffles the order of any sections, while question-level randomization works within a specific section, shuffling the order of tasks and follow-up questions. Both are supported, giving researchers the flexibility to reduce order bias, particularly useful when comparing multiple experiences.

Can you test multiple prototypes within the same study?

Yes, with no limitations on the number of prototypes you can link to a single study so you can add multiple Figma prototype sections and connect a different prototype to each one.

Can you reorder sections and questions in a study?

Given that Usability Testing studies can grow complex, the ability to reorder things quickly was a priority. You can reorder individual tasks and questions within a section, and sections themselves by dragging them in the Build panel.

How effectively can Usability Testing scale across a business?

Scaling research isn't just about running more studies, it's about helping more people across the business access insights, understand them, and use them to make decisions. With Usability Testing, product managers, designers, and stakeholders can quickly understand what happened and why without having to see hours of recording through the automatically generated highlight reels, key quotes, and transcripts.

Watch the full webinar

If you want to experience the full walkthrough, demo, and Q&A, watch the recording to see Usability Testing in action and pick up tips and best practices straight from the session.

👉 Watch the full webinar here.

Seeing is believing

Explore our tools and see how Optimal makes gathering insights simple, powerful, and impactful.