March 31, 2025
10

Designing User Experiences for Agentic AI: The Next Frontier

Beyond Generative AI: A New Paradigm Emerges

The AI landscape is undergoing a profound transformation. While generative AI has captured public imagination with its ability to create content, a new paradigm is quietly revolutionizing how we think about human-computer interaction: Agentic AI.

Unlike traditional software that waits for explicit commands or generative AI focused primarily on content creation, Agentic AI represents a fundamental shift toward truly autonomous systems. These advanced AI agents can independently make decisions, take actions, and solve complex problems with minimal human oversight. Rather than simply responding to prompts, they proactively work toward goals, demonstrating initiative and adaptability that more closely resembles human collaboration than traditional software interaction.

This evolution is already transforming industries across the board:

  • In customer service, AI agents handle complex inquiries end-to-end
  • In software development, they autonomously debug code and suggest improvements
  • In healthcare, they monitor patient data and flag concerning patterns
  • In finance, they analyze market trends and execute optimized strategies
  • In manufacturing and logistics, they orchestrate complex operations with minimal human intervention

As these autonomous systems become more prevalent, designing exceptional user experiences for them becomes not just important, but essential. The challenge? Traditional UX approaches built around graphical user interfaces and direct manipulation fall short when designing for AI that thinks and acts independently.

The New Interaction Model: From Commands to Collaboration

Interacting with Agentic AI represents a fundamental departure from conventional software experiences. The predictable, structured nature of traditional GUIs—with their buttons, menus, and visual feedback—gives way to something more fluid, conversational, and at times, unpredictable.

The ideal Agentic AI experience feels less like operating a tool and more like collaborating with a capable teammate. This shift demands that UX designers look beyond the visual aspects of interfaces to consider entirely new interaction models that emphasize:

  • Natural language as the primary interface
  • The AI's ability to take initiative appropriately
  • Establishing the right balance of autonomy and human control
  • Building and maintaining trust through transparency
  • Adapting to individual user preferences over time

The core challenge lies in bridging the gap between users accustomed to direct manipulation of software and the more abstract interactions inherent in systems that can think and act independently. How do we design experiences that harness the power of autonomy while maintaining the user's sense of control and understanding?

Understanding Users in the Age of Autonomous AI

The foundation of effective Agentic AI design begins with deep user understanding. Expectations for these autonomous agents are shaped by prior experiences with traditional AI assistants but require significant recalibration given their increased autonomy and capability.

Essential UX Research Methods for Agentic AI

Several research methodologies prove particularly valuable when designing for autonomous agents:

User Interviews provide rich qualitative insights into perceptions, trust factors, and control preferences. These conversations reveal the nuanced ways users think about AI autonomy—often accepting it readily for low-stakes tasks like calendar management while requiring more oversight for consequential decisions like financial planning.

Usability Testing with Agentic AI prototypes reveals how users react to AI initiative in real-time. Observing these interactions highlights moments where users feel empowered versus instances where they experience discomfort or confusion when the AI acts independently.

Longitudinal Studies track how user perceptions and interaction patterns evolve as the AI learns and adapts to individual preferences. Since Agentic AI improves through use, understanding this relationship over time provides critical design insights.

Ethnographic Research offers contextual understanding of how autonomous agents integrate into users' daily workflows and environments. This immersive approach reveals unmet needs and potential areas of friction that might not emerge in controlled testing environments.

Key Questions to Uncover

Effective research for Agentic AI should focus on several fundamental dimensions:

Perceived Autonomy: How much independence do users expect and desire from AI agents across different contexts? When does autonomy feel helpful versus intrusive?

Trust Factors: What elements contribute to users trusting an AI's decisions and actions? How quickly is trust lost when mistakes occur, and what mechanisms help rebuild it?

Control Mechanisms: What types of controls (pause, override, adjust parameters) do users expect to have over autonomous systems? How can these be implemented without undermining the benefits of autonomy?

Transparency Needs: What level of insight into the AI's reasoning do users require? How can this information be presented effectively without overwhelming them with technical complexity?

The answers to these questions vary significantly across user segments, task types, and domains—making comprehensive research essential for designing effective Agentic AI experiences.

Core UX Principles for Agentic AI Design

Designing for autonomous agents requires a unique set of principles that address their distinct characteristics and challenges:

Clear Communication

Effective Agentic AI interfaces facilitate natural, transparent communication between user and agent. The AI should clearly convey:

  • Its capabilities and limitations upfront
  • When it's taking action versus gathering information
  • Why it's making specific recommendations or decisions
  • What information it's using to inform its actions

Just as with human collaboration, clear communication forms the foundation of successful human-AI partnerships.

Robust Feedback Mechanisms

Agentic AI should provide meaningful feedback about its operations and make it easy for users to provide input on its performance. This bidirectional exchange enables:

  • Continuous learning and refinement of the agent's behavior
  • Adaptation to individual user preferences
  • Improved accuracy and usefulness over time

The most effective agents make feedback feel conversational rather than mechanical, encouraging users to shape the AI's behavior through natural interaction.

Thoughtful Error Handling

How an autonomous agent handles mistakes significantly impacts user trust and satisfaction. Effective error handling includes:

  • Proactively identifying potential errors before they occur
  • Clearly communicating when and why errors happen
  • Providing straightforward paths for recovery or human intervention
  • Learning from mistakes to prevent recurrence

The ability to gracefully manage errors and learn from them is often what separates exceptional Agentic AI experiences from frustrating ones.

Appropriate User Control

Users need intuitive mechanisms to guide and control autonomous agents, including:

  • Setting goals and parameters for the AI to work within
  • The ability to pause or stop actions in progress
  • Options to override decisions when necessary
  • Preferences that persist across sessions

The level of control should adapt to both user expertise and task criticality, offering more granular options for advanced users or high-stakes decisions.

Balanced Transparency

Effective Agentic AI provides appropriate visibility into its reasoning and decision-making processes without overwhelming users. This involves:

  • Making the AI's "thinking" visible and understandable
  • Explaining data sources and how they influence decisions
  • Offering progressive disclosure—basic explanations for casual users, deeper insights for those who want them

Transparency builds trust by demystifying what might otherwise feel like a "black box" of AI decision-making.

Proactive Assistance

Perhaps the most distinctive aspect of Agentic AI is its ability to anticipate needs and take initiative, offering:

  • Relevant suggestions based on user context
  • Automation of routine tasks without explicit commands
  • Timely information that helps users make better decisions

When implemented thoughtfully, this proactive assistance transforms the AI from a passive tool into a true collaborative partner.

Building User Confidence Through Transparency and Explainability

For users to embrace autonomous agents, they need to understand and trust how these systems operate. This requires both transparency (being open about how the system works) and explainability (providing clear reasons for specific decisions).

Several techniques can enhance these critical qualities:

  • Feature visualization that shows what the AI is "seeing" or focusing on
  • Attribution methods that identify influential factors in decisions
  • Counterfactual explanations that illustrate "what if" scenarios
  • Natural language explanations that translate complex reasoning into simple terms

From a UX perspective, this means designing interfaces that:

  • Clearly indicate when users are interacting with AI versus human systems
  • Make complex decisions accessible through visualizations or natural language
  • Offer progressive disclosure—basic explanations by default with deeper insights available on demand
  • Implement audit trails documenting the AI's actions and reasoning

The goal is to provide the right information at the right time, helping users understand the AI's behavior without drowning them in technical details.

Embracing Iteration and Continuous Testing

The dynamic, learning nature of Agentic AI makes traditional "design once, deploy forever" approaches inadequate. Instead, successful development requires:

Iterative Design Processes

  • Starting with minimal viable agents and expanding capabilities based on user feedback
  • Incorporating user input at every development stage
  • Continuously refining the AI's behavior based on real-world interaction data

Comprehensive Testing Approaches

  • A/B testing different AI behaviors with actual users
  • Implementing feedback loops for ongoing improvement
  • Monitoring key performance indicators related to user satisfaction and task completion
  • Testing for edge cases, adversarial inputs, and ethical alignment

Cross-Functional Collaboration

  • Breaking down silos between UX designers, AI engineers, and domain experts
  • Ensuring technical capabilities align with user needs
  • Creating shared understanding of both technical constraints and user expectations

This ongoing cycle of design, testing, and refinement ensures Agentic AI continuously evolves to better serve user needs.

Learning from Real-World Success Stories

Several existing applications offer valuable lessons for designing effective autonomous systems:

Autonomous Vehicles demonstrate the importance of clearly communicating intentions, providing reassurance during operation, and offering intuitive override controls for passengers.

Smart Assistants like Alexa and Google Assistant highlight the value of natural language processing, personalization based on user preferences, and proactive assistance.

Robotic Systems in industrial settings showcase the need for glanceable information, simplified task selection, and workflows that ensure safety in shared human-robot environments.

Healthcare AI emphasizes providing relevant insights to professionals, automating routine tasks to reduce cognitive load, and enhancing patient care through personalized recommendations.

Customer Service AI prioritizes personalized interactions, 24/7 availability, and the ability to handle both simple requests and complex problem-solving.

These successful implementations share several common elements:

  • They prioritize transparency about capabilities and limitations
  • They provide appropriate user control while maximizing the benefits of autonomy
  • They establish clear expectations about what the AI can and cannot do

Shaping the Future of Human-Agent Interaction

Designing user experiences for Agentic AI represents a fundamental shift in how we think about human-computer interaction. The evolution from graphical user interfaces to autonomous agents requires UX professionals to:

  • Move beyond traditional design patterns focused on direct manipulation
  • Develop new frameworks for building trust in autonomous systems
  • Create interaction models that balance AI initiative with user control
  • Embrace continuous refinement as both technology and user expectations evolve

The future of UX in this space will likely explore more natural interaction modalities (voice, gesture, mixed reality), increasingly sophisticated personalization, and thoughtful approaches to ethical considerations around AI autonomy.

For UX professionals and AI developers alike, this new frontier offers the opportunity to fundamentally reimagine the relationship between humans and technology—moving from tools we use to partners we collaborate with. By focusing on deep user understanding, transparent design, and iterative improvement, we can create autonomous AI experiences that genuinely enhance human capability rather than simply automating tasks.

The journey has just begun, and how we design these experiences today will shape our relationship with intelligent technology for decades to come.

Share this article
Author
Optimal
Workshop
Topics

Related articles

View all blog articles
Learn more
1 min read

Addressing AI Bias in UX: How to Build Fairer Digital Experiences

The Growing Challenge of AI Bias in Digital Products

AI is rapidly reshaping our digital landscape, powering everything from recommendation engines to automated customer service and content creation tools. But as these technologies become more widespread, we're facing a significant challenge: AI bias. When AI systems are trained on biased data, they end up reinforcing stereotypes, excluding marginalized groups, and creating inequitable digital experiences that harm both users and businesses.

This isn't just theoretical, we're seeing real-world consequences. Biased AI has led to resume screening tools that favor male candidates, facial recognition systems that perform poorly on darker skin tones, and language models that perpetuate harmful stereotypes. As AI becomes more deeply integrated into our digital experiences, addressing these biases isn't just an ethical imperative t's essential for creating products that truly work for everyone.

Why Does AI Bias Matter for UX?

For those of us in UX and product teams, AI bias isn't just an ethical issue it directly impacts usability, adoption, and trust. Research has shown that biased AI can result in discriminatory hiring algorithms, skewed facial recognition software, and search engines that reinforce societal prejudices (Buolamwini & Gebru, 2018).

When AI is applied to UX, these biases show up in several ways:

  • Navigation structures that favor certain user behaviors
  • Chatbots that struggle to recognize diverse dialects or cultural expressions
  • Recommendation engines that create "filter bubbles" 
  • Personalization algorithms that make incorrect assumptions 

These biases create real barriers that exclude users, diminish trust, and ultimately limit how effective our products can be. A 2022 study by the Pew Research Center found that 63% of Americans are concerned about algorithmic decision-making, with those concerns highest among groups that have historically faced discrimination.

The Root Causes of AI Bias

To tackle AI bias effectively, we need to understand where it comes from:

1. Biased Training Data

AI models learn from the data we feed them. If that data reflects historical inequities or lacks diversity, the AI will inevitably perpetuate these patterns. Think about a language model trained primarily on text written by and about men,  it's going to struggle to represent women's experiences accurately.

2. Lack of Diversity in Development Teams

When our AI and product teams lack diversity, blind spots naturally emerge. Teams that are homogeneous in background, experience, and perspective are simply less likely to spot potential biases or consider the needs of users unlike themselves.

3. Insufficient Testing Across Diverse User Groups

Without thorough testing across diverse populations, biases often go undetected until after launch when the damage to trust and user experience has already occurred.

How UX Research Can Mitigate AI Bias

At Optimal, we believe that continuous, human-centered research is key to designing fair and inclusive AI-driven experiences. Good UX research helps ensure AI-driven products remain unbiased and effective by:

Ensuring Diverse Representation

Conducting usability tests with participants from varied backgrounds helps prevent exclusionary patterns. This means:

  • Recruiting research participants who truly reflect the full diversity of your user base
  • Paying special attention to traditionally underrepresented groups
  • Creating safe spaces where participants feel comfortable sharing their authentic experiences
  • Analyzing results with an intersectional lens, looking at how different aspects of identity affect user experiences

Establishing Bias Monitoring Systems

Product owners can create ongoing monitoring systems to detect bias:

  • Develop dashboards that track key metrics broken down by user demographics
  • Schedule regular bias audits of AI-powered features
  • Set clear thresholds for when disparities require intervention
  • Make it easy for users to report perceived bias through simple feedback mechanisms

Advocating for Ethical AI Practices

Product owners are in a unique position to advocate for ethical AI development:

  • Push for transparency in how AI makes decisions that affect users
  • Champion features that help users understand AI recommendations
  • Work with data scientists to develop success metrics that consider equity, not just efficiency
  • Promote inclusive design principles throughout the entire product development lifecycle

The Future of AI and Inclusive UX

As AI becomes more sophisticated and pervasive, the role of customer insight and UX in ensuring fairness will only grow in importance. By combining AI's efficiency with human insight, we can ensure that AI-driven products are not just smart but also fair, accessible, and truly user-friendly for everyone. The question isn't whether we can afford to invest in this work, it's whether we can afford not to.

Learn more
1 min read

When Personalization Gets Personal: Balancing AI with Human-Centered Design

AI-driven personalization is redefining digital experiences, allowing companies to tailor content, recommendations, and interfaces to individual users at an unprecedented scale. From e-commerce product suggestions to content feeds, streaming recommendations, and even customized user interfaces, personalization has become a cornerstone of modern digital strategy. The appeal is clear: research shows that effective personalization can increase engagement by 72%, boost conversion rates by up to 30%, and drive revenue growth of 10-15%.

However, the reality often falls short of these impressive statistics. Personalization can easily backfire, frustrating users instead of engaging them, creating experiences that feel invasive rather than helpful, and sometimes actively driving users away from the very content or products they might genuinely enjoy. Many organizations invest heavily in AI technology while underinvesting in understanding how these personalized experiences actually impact their users.

The Widening Gap Between Capability and Quality

The technical capability to personalize digital experiences has advanced rapidly, but the quality of these experiences hasn't always kept pace. According to a 2023 survey by Baymard Institute, 68% of users reported encountering personalization that felt "off-putting" or "frustrating" in the previous month, while only 34% could recall a personalized experience that genuinely improved their interaction with a digital product.

This disconnect stems from a fundamental misalignment: while AI excels at pattern recognition and prediction based on historical data, it often lacks the contextual understanding and nuance that make personalization truly valuable. The result? Technically sophisticated personalization regularly misses the mark on actual user needs and preferences.

The Pitfalls of AI-Driven Personalization

Many companies struggle with personalization due to several common pitfalls that undermine even the most sophisticated AI implementations:

Over-Personalization: When Helpful Becomes Restrictive

AI that assumes too much can make users feel restricted or trapped in a "filter bubble" of limited options. This phenomenon, often called "over-personalization," occurs when algorithms become too confident in their understanding of user preferences.

Signs of over-personalization include:

  • Content feeds that become increasingly homogeneous over time
  • Disappearing options that might interest users but don't match their history
  • User frustration at being unable to discover new content or products
  • Decreased engagement as experiences become predictable and stale

A study by researchers at University of Minnesota found that highly personalized news feeds led to a 23% reduction in content diversity over time, even when users actively sought varied content. This "filter bubble" effect not only limits discovery but can leave users feeling manipulated or constrained.

Incorrect Assumptions: When Data Tells the Wrong Story

AI recommendations based on incomplete or misinterpreted data can lead to irrelevant, inappropriate, or even offensive suggestions. These incorrect assumptions often stem from:

  • Limited data points that don't capture the full context of user behavior
  • Misinterpreting casual interest as strong preference
  • Failing to distinguish between the user's behavior and actions taken on behalf of others
  • Not recognizing temporary or situational needs versus ongoing preferences

These misinterpretations can range from merely annoying (continuously recommending products similar to a one-time purchase) to deeply problematic (showing weight loss ads to users with eating disorders based on their browsing history).

A particularly striking example occurred when a major retailer's algorithm began sending pregnancy-related offers to a teenage girl before her family knew she was pregnant. While technically accurate in its prediction, this incident highlights how even "correct" personalization can fail to consider the broader human context and implications.

Lack of Transparency: The Black Box Problem

Users increasingly want to understand why they're being shown specific content or recommendations. When personalization happens behind a "black box" without explanation, it can create:

  • Distrust in the system and the brand behind it
  • Confusion about how to influence or improve recommendations
  • Feelings of being manipulated rather than assisted
  • Concerns about what personal data is being used and how

Research from the Pew Research Center shows that 74% of users consider it important to know why they are seeing certain recommendations, yet only 22% of personalization systems provide clear explanations for their suggestions.

Inconsistent Experiences Across Channels

Many organizations struggle to maintain consistent personalization across different touchpoints, creating disjointed experiences:

  • Product recommendations that vary wildly between web and mobile
  • Personalization that doesn't account for previous customer service interactions
  • Different personalization strategies across email, website, and app experiences
  • Recommendations that don't adapt to the user's current context or device

This inconsistency can make personalization feel random or arbitrary rather than thoughtfully tailored to the user's needs.

Neglecting Privacy Concerns and Control

As personalization becomes more sophisticated, user concerns about privacy intensify. Key issues include:

  • Collecting more data than necessary for effective personalization
  • Lack of user control over what information influences their experience
  • Unclear opt-out mechanisms for personalization features
  • Personalization that reveals sensitive information to others

A recent study found that 79% of users want control over what personal data influences their recommendations, but only 31% felt they had adequate control in their most-used digital products.

How Product Managers Can Leverage UX Insight for Better AI Personalization

To create a personalized experience that feels natural and helpful rather than creepy or restrictive, UX teams need to validate AI-driven decisions through systematic research with real users. Rather than treating personalization as a purely technical challenge, successful organizations recognize it as a human-centered design problem that requires continuous testing and refinement.

Understanding User Mental Models Through Card Sorting & Tree Testing

Card sorting and tree testing help structure content in a way that aligns with users' expectations and mental models, creating a foundation for personalization that feels intuitive rather than imposed:

  • Open and Closed Card Sorting – Helps understand how different user segments naturally categorize content, products, or features, providing a baseline for personalization strategies
  • Tree Testing – Validates whether personalized navigation structures work for different user types and contexts
  • Hybrid Approaches – Combining card sorting with interviews to understand not just how users categorize items, but why they do so

Case Study: A financial services company used card sorting with different customer segments to discover distinct mental models for organizing financial products. Rather than creating a one-size-fits-all personalization system, they developed segment-specific personalization frameworks that aligned with these different mental models, resulting in a 28% increase in product discovery and application rates.

Validating Interaction Patterns Through First-Click Testing

First-click testing ensures users interact with personalized experiences as intended across different contexts and scenarios:

  • Testing how users respond to personalized elements vs. standard content
  • Evaluating whether personalization cues (like "Recommended for you") influence click behavior
  • Comparing how different user segments respond to the same personalization approaches
  • Identifying potential confusion points in personalized interfaces

Research by the Nielsen Norman Group found that getting the first click right increases the overall task success rate by 87%. For personalized experiences, this is even more critical, as users may abandon a site entirely if early personalized recommendations seem irrelevant or confusing.

Gathering Qualitative Insights Through User Interviews & Usability Testing

Direct observation and conversation with users provides critical context for personalization strategies:

  • Moderated Usability Testing – Reveals how users react to personalized elements in real-time
  • Think-Aloud Protocols – Help understand users' expectations and reactions to personalization
  • Longitudinal Studies – Track how perceptions of personalization change over time and repeated use
  • Contextual Inquiry – Observes how personalization fits into users' broader goals and environments

These qualitative approaches help answer critical questions like:

  • When does personalization feel helpful versus intrusive?
  • What level of explanation do users want for recommendations?
  • How do different user segments react to similar personalization strategies?
  • What control do users expect over their personalized experience?

Measuring Sentiment Through Surveys & User Feedback

Systematic feedback collection helps gauge users' comfort levels with AI-driven recommendations:

  • Targeted Microsurveys – Quick pulse checks after personalized interactions
  • Preference Centers – Direct input mechanisms for refining personalization
  • Satisfaction Tracking – Monitoring how personalization affects overall satisfaction metrics
  • Feature-Specific Feedback – Gathering input on specific personalization features

A streaming service discovered through targeted surveys that users were significantly more satisfied with content recommendations when they could see a clear explanation of why items were suggested (e.g., "Because you watched X"). Implementing these explanations increased content exploration by 34% and reduced account cancellations by 8%.

A/B Testing Personalization Approaches

Experimental validation ensures personalization actually improves key metrics:

  • Testing different levels of personalization intensity
  • Comparing explicit versus implicit personalization methods
  • Evaluating various approaches to explaining recommendations
  • Measuring the impact of personalization on both short and long-term engagement

Importantly, A/B testing should look beyond immediate conversion metrics to consider longer-term impacts on user satisfaction, trust, and retention.

Building a User-Centered Personalization Strategy That Works

To implement personalization that truly enhances user experience, organizations should follow these research-backed principles:

1. Start with User Needs, Not Technical Capabilities

The most effective personalization addresses genuine user needs rather than showcasing algorithmic sophistication:

  • Identify specific pain points that personalization could solve
  • Understand which aspects of your product would benefit most from personalization
  • Determine where users already expect or desire personalized experiences
  • Recognize which elements should remain consistent for all users

2. Implement Transparent Personalization

Users increasingly expect to understand and control how their experiences are personalized:

  • Clearly communicate what aspects of the experience are personalized
  • Explain the primary factors influencing recommendations
  • Provide simple mechanisms for users to adjust or reset their personalization
  • Consider making personalization opt-in for sensitive domains

3. Design for Serendipity and Discovery

Effective personalization balances predictability with discovery:

  • Deliberately introduce variety into recommendations
  • Include "exploration" categories alongside highly targeted suggestions
  • Monitor and prevent increasing homogeneity in personalized feeds over time
  • Allow users to easily branch out beyond their established patterns

4. Apply Progressive Personalization

Rather than immediately implementing highly tailored experiences, consider a gradual approach:

  • Begin with light personalization based on explicit user choices
  • Gradually introduce more sophisticated personalization as users engage
  • Calibrate personalization depth based on relationship strength and context
  • Adjust personalization based on user feedback and behavior

5. Establish Continuous Feedback Loops

Personalization should never be "set and forget":

  • Implement regular evaluation cycles for personalization effectiveness
  • Create easy feedback mechanisms for users to rate recommendations
  • Monitor for signs of over-personalization or filter bubbles
  • Regularly test personalization assumptions with diverse user groups

The Future of Personalization: Human-Centered AI

As AI capabilities continue to advance, the companies that will succeed with personalization won't necessarily be those with the most sophisticated algorithms, but those who best integrate human understanding into their approach. The future of personalization lies in creating systems that:

  • Learn from qualitative human feedback, not just behavioral data
  • Respect the nuance and complexity of human preferences
  • Maintain transparency in how personalization works
  • Empower users with appropriate control
  • Balance algorithm-driven efficiency with human-centered design principles

AI should learn from real people, not just data. UX research ensures that personalization enhances, rather than alienates, users by bringing human insight to algorithmic decisions.

By combining the pattern-recognition power of AI with the contextual understanding provided by UX research, organizations can create personalized experiences that feel less like surveillance and more like genuine understanding: experiences that don't just predict what users might click, but truly respond to what they need and value.

Learn more
1 min read

Optimal vs. Maze: Deep User Insights or Surface-Level Design Feedback

Product teams face an important decision when selecting the right user research platform: do they prioritize speed and simplicity, or invest in a more comprehensive platform that offers real research depth and insights? This choice becomes even more critical as user research scales and those insights directly influence major product decisions.

Maze has gained popularity in recent years among design and product teams for its focus on rapid prototype testing and design workflow integration. However, as teams scale their research programs and require more sophisticated insights, many discover that Maze's limitations outweigh its simplicity. Platform stability issues, restricted tools and functionality, and a lack of enterprise features creates friction that end up compromising insight speed, quality and overall business impact.

Why Choose Optimal instead of Maze?

Platform Depth

Test Design Limitations

  • Maze has Rigid Question Types: Maze's focus on speed comes with design inflexibility, including rigid question structures and limited customization options that reduce overall test effectiveness.
  • Optimal Offers Comprehensive Test Flexibility: Optimal has a Figma integration, image import capabilities, and fully customizable test flows designed for agile product teams.

Prototype Testing Capabilities

  • Maze has Limited Prototype Support: Users report difficulties with Maze's prototype testing capabilities, particularly with complex interactions and advanced design systems that modern products require.
  • Optimal has Advanced Prototype Testing: Optimal supports sophisticated prototype testing with full Figma integration, comprehensive interaction capture, and flexible testing methods that accommodate modern product design and development workflows.

Analysis and Reporting Quality

  • Maze Only Offers Surface-Level Reporting: Maze provides basic metrics and surface-level analysis without the depth required for strategic decision-making or comprehensive user insight.
  • Optimal has Rich, Actionable Insights: Optimal delivers AI-powered analysis with layered insights, export-ready reports, and sophisticated visualizations that transform data into actionable business intelligence.

Enterprise Features

  • Maze has a Reactive Support Model: Maze provides responsive support primarily for critical issues but lacks the proactive, dedicated support enterprise product teams require.
  • Optimal Provides Dedicated Enterprise Support: Optimal offers fast, personalized support with dedicated account teams and comprehensive training resources built by user experience experts that ensure your team is set up for success.

Enterprise Readiness

  • Maze is Buit for Individuals: Maze was built primarily for individual designers and small teams, lacking the enterprise features, compliance capabilities, and scalability that large organizations need.
  • Optimal is an Enterprise-Built Platform: Optimal was designed for enterprise use with comprehensive security protocols, compliance certifications, and scalability features that support large research programs across multiple teams and business units. Optimal is currently trusted by some of the world’s biggest brands including Netflix, Lego and Nike. 

Enterprises Need Reliable, Scalable User Insights

While Maze's focus on speed appeals to design teams seeking rapid iteration, enterprise product teams need the stability and reliability that only mature platforms provide. Optimal delivers both speed and dependability, enabling teams to iterate quickly without compromising research quality or business impact.Platform reliability isn't just about uptime, it's about helping product teams make high quality strategic decisions and to build organizational confidence in user insights. Mature product, design and UX teams need to choose platforms that enhance rather than undermine their research credibility.

Don't let platform limitations compromise your research potential.

Ready to see how leading brands including Lego, Netflix and Nike achieve better research outcomes? Experience how Optimal's platform delivers user insights that adapt to your team's growing needs.

Seeing is believing

Explore our tools and see how Optimal makes gathering insights simple, powerful, and impactful.