How to convince others of the importance of UX research

Making a difference through UX was a shared passion among an impressive line-up of 7 researchers, strategists, and designers from the global UX community at this year’s 100% virtual 3-day UX New Zealand conference.

‍

‍

1. From bombs to bots: the evolving landscape of frontline research

‍

These days Darya Pilram, Senior Researcher at Twitter, spends her days trying to understand the motivation and techniques of groups who ‘hire’ technology to spread harmful narratives.  The desert of Mogadishu and the urban conflicts of South Africa are just some of the unlikely places she’s leveraged the power of frontline research to create change.

‍

"I realized the only way to influence change was by bringing folks along with me - and so I did.  I bought them right into the field with me."

‍

‍

‍

‍

2. Beautifully accessible: why embracing inclusive design shouldn’t hold back your creativity

‍

Experience Designer Beth McPhail refuses to buy into the mindset that ‘accessibility is a creativity killer’. She challenges her peers to view accessibility as an opportunity to grow creatively while making technology more inclusive.

‍

“Accessibility is making it possible for someone to attend the party…and lose themselves in the music.”

‍

‍

‍

‍

3. Innovating within the Justice sector | Part 2: For a fairer start - design’s role in shaping mana enhancing social & systemic change.

‍

Kelsey Gee is back challenging designers across all levels to think differently about how design can be used across different mediums and constraints to generate meaningful experiences and meaningful change.  In this session, she explores design’s role in creating empowering experiences that break both cycles of crime and institutional racism. (If you missed Part 1 from Mini Con head over here)

‍

"I truly believe that our superpower lies in our ability to redesign society, especially for our whanau and our most vulnerable communities…and once again explore design’s role in creating equal opportunities across safe, seamless, and healing public services."

‍

‍

‍

‍

4. First do no harm: make your designs more trauma-informed and survivor sensitive

‍

In 1985, a researcher botched an interview question which led to a new understanding of trauma and its long-term effects. It grew awareness of the need to be trauma-informed in your work but what’s it actually mean?  UX Researcher Melissa Eggleston explores what it means to be trauma-informed and shares practical advice on how to achieve it.

‍

"Trauma is everywhere and something for us to think about…regardless of whether we’re working with people we know are dealing with traumatic events…it’s really all over the place."

‍

‍

‍

5. Changing the way we design high-risk products to make meaningful impact

‍

One in five people experiences “mental illness or significant mental distress” in New Zealand.  It’s a problem the Government knows needs to be addressed but how? In her powerful presentation, Rachael Reeves reveals what’s involved in balancing the complexities of Government with the need to rethink the way we design health products.

‍

"Be warned you can’t please everyone and it can be tough to keep product vision aligned when you’re talking about serious consequences for people."

‍

‍

‍

6. Remote research with new internet users (yes you can!)

‍

One billion new internet users (NIU) will come online for the first time over the next 5 years. These NIU's are using their first smartphones, with most of their online activities focused on communication, maintaining social connections, and entertainment. Tiane Lee, UX Research Lead at Google outlines the challenges and considerations behind adapting research for varying levels of digital literacy, including practical ideas for planning and conducting remote research with NIU.

‍

"NIU’s are typically less digitally literate, they may show lower confidence in digital capability, and they may perceive lower value of the internet for things like chatting and entertainment.”

‍

‍

‍

‍

7. Conditions Design: weaving the invisible threads of service design, value orchestration, and culture building  

‍

Michael Tam introduces us to the niche field of conditions design and cites a purpose built high diving board on Wellington city’s busy waterfront in New Zealand as a good example of conditions design.  Find out why in this fascinating talk.

‍

"What really impressed me here…hats off to the council because they didn’t design an experience that would discourage people from doing it. It’s designed for people to have fun (vs Hong Kong where public spaces are designed for Tai Chi not fun like this). The design allows it to happen by influencing human behavior to stay safe but encouraging fun and exploration.”

‍

‍

‍

‍

For a taste of what even more speakers from UX New Zealand 2022 had to share, head over to our highlights reel

Knowing and understanding why and how your users use your product is invaluable for getting to the nitty gritty of usability. Delving deep with probing questions into motivation or skimming over looking for issues can equally be informative. 

‍

Put super simply, usability testing literally is testing how usable your product is for your users. If your product isn’t usable users often won’t complete their task, let alone come back for more. No one wants to lose users before they even get started. Usability testing gets under their skin and really into the how, why and what they want (and equally what they don’t).

‍

As we have been getting used to video calling regularly and using the internet for interactions, usability testing has followed suit. Being able to access participants remotely has allowed us to diversify the participant pool by not being restricted to those that are close enough to be in-person. This has also allowed an increase in the number of participants per test, as it becomes more cost-effective to perform remote usability testing.

‍

But if we’re remote, does this mean it can’t be moderated? No - remote testing, along with modern technology, can mean that remote testing can be facilitated and moderated. But what is the best method - moderated or unmoderated?

‍

What is moderated remote research testing?

‍

In traditional usability testing, moderated research is done in person. With the moderator and the participant in the same physical space. This, of course, allows for conversation and observational behavioral monitoring. Meaning the moderator can note not only what the participant answers but how and even make note of the body language, surroundings, and other influencing factors. 

‍

This has also meant that traditionally, the participant pool has been limited to those that can be available (and close enough) to make it into a facility for testing. And being in person has meant it takes time (and money) to perform these tests.

‍

As technology has moved along and the speed of internet connections and video calling has increased, this has opened up a world of opportunities for usability testing. Allowing usability testing to be done remotely. Moderators can now set up testing remotely and ‘dial in’ to observe participants anywhere they are. And potentially even running focus groups or other testing in a group format across the internet. 

‍

Pros of moderated remote research testing:

‍

- In-depth gathering of insights through a back-and-forth conversation and observing of the participants.

‍

- Follow-up questions don’t underestimate the value of being available to ask questions throughout the testing. And following up in the moment.

‍

- Observational monitoring noticing and noting the environment and how the participants are behaving, can give more insight into how or why they choose to make a decision.

‍

- Quick remote testing can be quicker to start, find participants, and complete than in-person. This is because you only need to set up a time to connect via the internet, rather than coordinating travel times, etc.

‍

- Location (local and/or international) Testing online removes reliance on participants being physically present for the testing. This broadens your ability to broaden the pool, and participants can be either within your country or global. 

‍

Cons of moderated remote research testing:

‍

- Time-consuming having to be present at each test takes time. As does analyzing the data and insights generated. But remember, this is quality data.

‍

- Limited interactions with any remote testing there is only so much you can observe or understand across the window of a computer screen. It can be difficult to have a grasp on all the factors that might be influencing your participants.

‍

What is unmoderated remote research testing?

‍

In its most simple sense, unmoderated user testing removes the ‘moderated’ part of the equation. Instead of having a facilitator guide participants through the test, participants are left to complete the testing by themselves and in their own time. For the most part, everything else stays the same. 

‍

Removing the moderator, means that there isn’t anyone to respond to queries or issues in the moment. This can either delay, influence, or even potentially force participants to not complete or maybe not be as engaged as you may like. Unmoderated research testing suits a very simple and direct type of test. With clear instructions and no room for inference. 

‍

Pros of unmoderated remote research testing:

‍

- Speed and turnaround,  as there is no need to schedule meetings with each and every participant. Unmoderated usability testing is usually much faster to initiate and complete.

‍

- Size of study (participant numbers) unmoderated usability testing allows you to collect feedback from dozens or even hundreds of users at the same time. 

- Location (local and/or international) Testing online removes reliance on participants being physically present for the testing, which broadens your participant pool.  And unmoderated testing means that it literally can be anywhere while participants complete the test in their own time.

‍

Cons of unmoderated remote research testing:

‍

- Follow-up questions as your participants are working on their own and in their own time, you can’t facilitate and ask questions in the moment. You may be able to ask limited follow-up questions.

‍

- Products need to be simple to use unmoderated testing does not allow for prototypes or any product or site that needs guidance. 

‍

- Low participant support without the moderator any issues with the test or the product can’t be picked up immediately and could influence the output of the test.

‍

When should you do moderated vs unmoderated remote usability testing?

‍

Each moderated and unmoderated remote usability testing have its use and place in user research. It really depends on the question you are asking and what you are wanting to know.

‍

Moderated testing allows you to gather in-depth insights, follow up with questions, and engage the participants in the moment. The facilitator has the ability to guide participants to what they want to know, to dig deeper, or even ask why at certain points. This method doesn’t need as much careful setup as the participants aren’t on their own. While this is all done online, it does still allow connection and conversation. This method allows for more investigative research. Looking at why users might prefer one prototype to another. Or possibly tree testing a new website navigation to understand where they might get lost and querying why the participant made certain choices.

‍

Unmoderated testing, on the other hand, is literally leaving the participants to it. This method needs very careful planning and explaining upfront. The test needs to be able to be set and run without a moderator. This lends itself more to wanting to know a direct answer to a query. Such as a card sort on a website to understand how your users might sort information. Or a first click to see how/where users will click on a new website.

‍

Planning your next user test? Here’s how to choose the right method

‍

With the ability to expand our pool of participants across the globe with all of the advances (and acceptance of) technology and video calling etc, the ability to expand our understanding of users’ experiences is growing. Remote usability testing is a great option when you want to gather information from users in the real world. Depending on your query, moderated or unmoderated usability testing will suit your study. As with all user testing, being prepared and planning ahead will allow you to make the most of your test.

In today's fast-paced product development landscape, the ability to quickly gather and act on user insights is more critical than ever. While dedicated UX researchers play a crucial role, there's a growing trend towards democratizing UX research – empowering team members across various functions to contribute to and benefit from user insights. Let's explore how this approach can transform your organization's approach to user-centered design.

‍

Benefits of a democratized UXR approach

‍

Democratizing UX research is a transformative approach that empowers organizations to unlock the full potential of user insights. By breaking down traditional barriers and involving a broader range of team members in the research process, companies can foster a culture of user-centricity, accelerate decision-making, and drive innovation. This inclusive strategy not only enhances the depth and breadth of user understanding but also aligns diverse perspectives to create more impactful, user-friendly products and services. Here are a few of the benefits of this movement:

‍

Increased research velocity

‍

By enabling more team members to conduct basic research, organizations can gather insights more frequently and rapidly. This means that instead of waiting for dedicated UX researchers to be available, product managers, designers, or marketers can quickly run simple surveys or usability tests. For example, a product manager could use a user-friendly tool to get quick feedback on a new feature idea, allowing the team to iterate faster. This increased velocity helps organizations stay agile and responsive to user needs in a fast-paced market.

‍

Broader perspective

‍

Cross-functional participation brings diverse viewpoints to research, potentially uncovering insights that might be missed by specialized researchers alone. A developer might ask questions from a technical feasibility standpoint, while a marketer might focus on brand perception. This diversity in approach can lead to richer, more comprehensive insights. For instance, during a user interview, a sales team member might pick up on specific pain points related to competitor products that a UX researcher might not have thought to explore.

‍

Enhanced user-centricity

‍

When more team members engage directly with users, it fosters a culture of user-centricity across the organization. This direct exposure to user feedback and behaviors helps all team members develop empathy for the user. As a result, user needs and preferences become a central consideration in all decision-making processes, not just in UX design. For example, seeing users struggle with a feature firsthand might motivate a developer to champion user-friendly improvements in future sprints.

‍

Improved research adoption

‍

Team members who participate in research are more likely to understand and act on the insights generated. When people are involved in gathering data, they have a deeper understanding of the context and nuances of the findings. This personal investment leads to greater buy-in and increases the likelihood that research insights will be applied in practical ways. For instance, a product manager who conducts user interviews is more likely to prioritize features based on actual user needs rather than assumptions.

‍

Resource optimization

‍

Democratization allows dedicated researchers to focus on more complex, high-value research initiatives. By offloading simpler research tasks to other team members, professional UX researchers can dedicate their expertise to more challenging projects, such as longitudinal studies, complex usability evaluations, or strategic research initiatives. This optimization ensures that specialized skills are applied where they can have the most significant impact.

‍

Our survey revealed that organizations with a more democratized approach to UXR tend to have higher levels of research maturity and integration into product development processes. This correlation suggests that democratization not only increases the quantity of research conducted but also enhances its quality and impact. Organizations that empower cross-functional teams to participate in UXR often develop more sophisticated research practices over time.

‍

For example, these organizations might:

‍

• Have better-defined research processes and guidelines
• Integrate user insights more consistently into decision-making at all levels
• Develop more advanced metrics for measuring the impact of UXR
• Foster a culture where challenging assumptions with user data is the norm
• Create more opportunities for collaboration between different departments around user insights

‍

By democratizing UXR, organizations can create a virtuous cycle where increased participation leads to better research practices, which in turn drives more value from UXR activities. This approach helps to embed user-centricity deeply into the organizational culture, leading to better products and services that truly meet user needs.

‍

Strategies for upskilling people who do research (PWDRs)

‍

To successfully democratize UXR, it's crucial to provide proper training and support:

‍

1. UXR basics workshops

Offer regular training sessions on fundamental research methods and best practices. These workshops should cover a range of topics, including:

‍

• Introduction to user research methodologies (e.g., interviews, surveys, usability testing)
• Basics of research design and planning
• Participant recruitment strategies
• Data analysis techniques
• Ethical considerations in user research

‍

For example, a monthly "UXR 101" workshop could be organized, where different aspects of UX research are covered in depth. These sessions could be led by experienced researchers and include practical exercises to reinforce learning.

‍

Check out our 101 Guides

‍

2. Mentorship programs

‍

Pair non-researchers with experienced UX researchers for guidance and support. This one-on-one relationship allows for personalized learning and hands-on guidance. 

‍

Mentors can:

• Provide feedback on research plans
• Offer advice on challenging research scenarios
• Share best practices and personal experiences
• Help mentees navigate the complexities of user research in their specific organizational context

‍

A formal mentorship program could be established with clear goals, regular check-ins, and a defined duration (e.g., 6 months), after which mentees could become mentors themselves, scaling the program.

‍

3. Research playbooks

‍

Develop standardized templates and guidelines for common research activities. These playbooks serve as go-to resources for non-researchers, ensuring consistency and quality across studies. 

‍

They might include:

‍

• Step-by-step guides for different research methods
• Templates for research plans, screeners, and report structures
• Best practices for participant interaction
• Guidelines for data privacy and ethical considerations
• Tips for presenting and socializing research findings

‍

For instance, a "Usability Testing Playbook" could walk a product manager through the entire process of planning, conducting, and reporting on a usability test.

‍

Check out Optimal Playbooks

‍

4. Collaborative research

‍

Involve non-researchers in studies led by experienced UX professionals to provide hands-on learning opportunities.

‍

This approach allows non-researchers to:

‍

• Observe best practices in action
• Contribute to real research projects
• Understand the nuances and challenges of UX research
• Build confidence in their research skills under expert guidance

‍

For example, a designer could assist in a series of user interviews, gradually taking on more responsibility with each session under the researcher's supervision.

‍

5. Continuous learning resources

‍

Provide access to online courses, webinars, and industry events to foster ongoing skill development. This could include:

‍

• Subscriptions to UX research platforms and tools
• Access to online course libraries (e.g., Coursera, LinkedIn Learning)
• Budget for attending UX conferences and workshops
• Internal knowledge sharing sessions where team members present on recent learnings or projects

‍

An internal UX research resource hub could be created, curating relevant articles, videos, and courses for easy access by team members.

‍

As one UX leader in our study noted, "It's been exciting to see [UXR] evolve as a discipline and see where it is today, and to see the various backgrounds and research specialisms that [user] researchers have today is not something I'd have expected."

‍

This quote highlights the dynamic nature of UX research and the diversity it now encompasses. The field has evolved to welcome practitioners from various backgrounds, each bringing unique perspectives and skills. This diversity enriches the discipline and makes it more adaptable to different organizational contexts.

‍

For example:

‍

• A former teacher might excel at educational research for EdTech products
• A psychologist could bring deep insights into user behavior and motivation
• A data scientist might introduce advanced analytical techniques to UX research

‍

By embracing this diversity and providing comprehensive support for skill development, organizations can create a rich ecosystem of UX research capabilities. This not only democratizes the practice but also elevates its overall quality and impact.

‍

The key to successful democratization lies in balancing accessibility with rigor. While making UX research more widely practiced, it's crucial to maintain high standards and ethical practices. The strategies outlined above help achieve this balance by providing structure, guidance, and ongoing support to those new to UX research, while leveraging the expertise of experienced researchers to ensure quality and depth in the organization's overall research efforts.

‍

Tools and platforms enabling broader participation

‍

The democratization of UXR has been greatly facilitated by comprehensive, user-friendly research platforms like Optimal Workshop. Our all-in-one solution offers a suite of tools designed to empower both seasoned researchers and non-researchers alike:

‍

Surveys

‍

Our intuitive survey creation tool allows anyone in your organization to quickly design and distribute surveys. With customizable templates and an easy-to-use interface, gathering user feedback has never been simpler.

‍

Tree Testing and Card Sorting

‍

These powerful tools simplify the process of conducting information architecture and card sorting studies. Non-researchers can easily set up and run tests to validate navigation structures and content organization.

‍

Qualitative Insights

‍

Our powerful qualitative analysis tool enables team members across your organization to efficiently analyze and synthesize user interview data. With its user-friendly interface, our Qualitative Insights tool makes deriving meaningful insights from qualitative research accessible to researchers and non-researchers alike.

‍

First-click Testing

This easy-to-use first-click testing tool empowers anyone in your team to quickly set up and run tests to evaluate the effectiveness of their designs. First-click Testing simplifies the process of gathering initial user impressions, allowing for rapid iteration and improvement of user interfaces.

‍

These tools, integrated into a single, user-friendly platform, make it possible for non-researchers to conduct basic studies and contribute to the overall research effort without extensive training. The intuitive design of the Optimal Workshop UXR and insights platform ensures that team members across different functions can easily engage in user research activities, from planning and execution to analysis and sharing of insights.

‍

By providing a comprehensive, accessible platform, Optimal Workshop plays a crucial role in democratizing UX research, enabling organizations to build a more user-centric culture and make data-driven decisions at all levels.

‍

Balancing democratization with expertise

‍

While democratizing UXR offers numerous benefits, it's crucial to strike a balance with professional expertise. This balance involves establishing quality control measures, reserving complex research initiatives for trained professionals, maintaining strategic oversight by experienced researchers, providing clear guidelines on research ethics and data privacy, and leveraging dedicated researchers' expertise for insight synthesis. 

‍

Our survey revealed that organizations successfully balancing democratization with expertise tend to see the highest impact from their UXR efforts. The goal of democratization is not to replace dedicated researchers but to expand the organization's capacity for generating user insights. By empowering cross-functional teams to participate in UXR, companies can foster a more user-centric culture, increase the velocity of insight generation, and ultimately create products that better meet user needs. 

‍

As we look to the future, the trend towards democratization is likely to continue, and organizations that can effectively balance broad participation with professional expertise will be best positioned to thrive in an increasingly user-centric business landscape.

‍

Ready to democratize your UX research? Optimal Workshop's platform empowers your entire team to contribute to user insights while maintaining professional quality. Our intuitive tools accelerate research velocity and foster a user-centric culture. 

‍

Start your free trial today and transform your UXR practice. 

‍