Bye-bye Beta 👋🏼 Hello Prototype Testing 🚀

We’re excited to launch our video recording functionality for prototype testing, enabling you to dive deeper into the “why” behind user actions and empowering you to make data-informed decisions faster and with greater confidence.

See User Actions Come to Life

Capture the nuance of user interactions with screen, audio, and/or video recording. With Optimal’s video recording feature, you can:
‍

• Understand Intent: Watch users in action to reveal their decision-making process.
• Spot Friction Points: Identify moments of hesitation, confusion, or frustration.
• Test Your Ideas: Leverage user insights to make informed decisions before moving forward.‍
• Track Task Success: Combine video insights with quantitative data to understand what works and what needs refinement.
• Share Compelling Insights: Use recordings to drive alignment across your team and key stakeholders.
  ‍

Drive Value with Video Recordings and Prototype Testing

‍
‍By combining video recordings with prototype testing, you can unlock actionable insights that make a real impact. 
‍

Here’s how they drive value for your initiatives:
‍

• Higher Conversion Rates: Optimized designs based on real user feedback lead to increased engagement.
• Greater User Satisfaction: Tested prototypes help to better align your experiences with user needs and expectations.
• Reduced Development Costs: Catch issues early to avoid costly fixes later in the development process.
• Faster Time-to-Market: Resolve design flaws early to accelerate project timelines.
  ‍

Recruit the Right Participants for Richer Results‍

Optimal combines the power of video recording, participant recruitment, and a comprehensive UX insights and research platform to elevate your product and research process.
‍

Use Optimal’s recruitment service to quickly connect you with millions of people in 150+ countries ready to take part in your study. Our in-house team handles feasibility assessments, sends reminders and confirmations, reviews personalized study setups, and conducts human checks to ensure high quality participants to maximize the value of your video recordings.
‍

Thank you, Beta Testers‍

We’re grateful to our early adopters and beta testers for shaping the future of video recording and prototype testing. Based on your valuable feedback, we’ve made the following updates:
‍

Video recording updates

• Additional recording controls: You can now control whether to reject participants or forward a participant to a non-recording study link if they do not meet your recording criteria. 
• Translations: Set your study language and translate the recording instructions into 180+ languages.
• No video expirations: We’ve removed video expirations, ensuring your recordings remain accessible as long as you have an active Optimal subscription.
• Improved participant experience: We’ve improved the technology to reduce technical errors, creating a more reliable and user-friendly experience.
  ‍

Prototype testing updates

• Collapse/expand and move tasks: Increase prototype visibility by hiding or moving tasks, making it easier for participants to view and interact with more of your design, especially for mobile prototypes.
• Option to end tasks automatically: When enabled, tasks will automatically end 0.5 seconds after a participant reaches a correct destination, removing the need for participants to confirm that they've completed the task. This can improve the overall participant experience, removing steps and making tests faster to complete.
  
• Increased Figma frame limit:  We’ve increased the Figma frame limit from 30 to 100 frames to support larger, more complex prototypes.
• Expanded task results: Task path results now indicated completed and skipped tasks for better analysis.
• Time-saving improvements: Auto-select the starting screen after importing a Figma prototype, and enjoy task selection persistence across tabs in the analysis view.
• Enhanced security: We’ve updated Figma authorization for expanded security for your prototypes.
  ‍

Ready to unlock the power of video recording?
Get started with a prototype test in Optimal or visit our help documentation to learn more.

‍

‍

Many smaller product teams find newer research tools like Ballpark attractive due to their promises of being able to provide simple and quick user feedback tools. However, larger teams conducting UX research that drives product strategy need platforms capable of delivering actionable insights rather than just surface-level metrics. While Ballpark provides basic testing functionality that works for simple validation, Optimal offers the research depth, comprehensive analysis capabilities, and strategic intelligence that teams require when making critical product decisions.

‍

Why Choose Optimal over Ballpark?

‍

Surface-Level Feedback vs. Strategic Research Intelligence

‍

• Ballpark's Shallow Analysis: Ballpark focuses on collecting quick feedback through basic surveys and simple preference tests, but lacks the analytical depth needed to understand why users behave as they do or what actions to take based on findings.
• Optimal's Strategic Insights: Optimal transforms user feedback into strategic intelligence through advanced analytics, behavioral analysis, and AI-powered insights that reveal not just what happened, but why it happened and what to do about it.
• Limited Research Methodology: Ballpark's toolset centers on simple feedback collection without comprehensive research methods like advanced card sorting, tree testing, or sophisticated user journey analysis.
• Complete Research Arsenal: Optimal provides the full spectrum of research methodologies needed to understand complex user behaviors, validate design decisions, and guide strategic product development.

‍

Quick Metrics vs. Actionable Intelligence

‍

• Basic Data Collection: Ballpark provides simple metrics and basic reporting that tell you what happened but leave teams to figure out the 'why' and 'what next' on their own.
• Intelligent Analysis: Optimal's AI-powered analysis doesn't just collect data—it identifies patterns, predicts user behavior, and provides specific recommendations that guide product decisions.
• Limited Participant Insights: Ballpark's 3 million participant panel provides basic demographic targeting but lacks the sophisticated segmentation and behavioral profiling needed for nuanced research.
• Deep User Understanding: Optimal's 100+ million verified participants across 150+ countries enable precise targeting and comprehensive user profiling that reveals deep behavioral insights and cultural nuances.

‍

Startup Risk vs. Enterprise Reliability

‍

• Unproven Stability: As a recently founded startup with limited funding transparency, Ballpark presents platform stability risks and uncertain long-term viability for enterprise research investments.
• Proven Enterprise Reliability: Optimal has successfully launched over 100,000 studies with 99.9% uptime guarantee, providing the reliability and stability enterprise organizations require.
• Limited Support Infrastructure: Ballpark's small team and basic support options cannot match the dedicated account management and enterprise support that strategic research programs demand.
• Enterprise Support Excellence: Optimal provides dedicated account managers, 24/7 enterprise support, and comprehensive onboarding that ensures research program success.

‍

When to Choose Optimal

‍

Optimal is the best choice for teams looking for: 

‍

• Actionable Intelligence: When teams need insights that directly inform product strategy and design decisions
• Behavioral Understanding: Projects requiring deep analysis of why users behave as they do
• Complex Research Questions: Studies that demand sophisticated methodologies and advanced analytics
• Strategic Product Decisions: When research insights drive major feature development and business direction
• Comprehensive User Insights: Teams needing complete user understanding beyond basic preference testing
• Competitive Advantage: Organizations using research intelligence to outperform competitors

‍

Ready to move beyond basic feedback to strategic research intelligence? Experience how Optimal's analytical depth and comprehensive insights drive product decisions that create competitive advantage.

‍

‍

When selecting user research and insight tools, product and design teams must decide between two distinct approaches: investing in multiple niche tools that address specific parts of the user research workflow, such as Askable for participant recruitment, or choosing a comprehensive platform like Optimal that supports the entire product development lifecycle from research planning through to insight.

‍

Why choose Optimal instead of Askable?

‍

Recruitment-Only Tools vs. Comprehensive User Research Platforms

‍

Platform Scope and Capabilities

‍

• Askable's Limitations: Askable specializes exclusively in participant recruitment, requiring teams to integrate multiple third-party tools for testing, analysis, and insight generation. This fragmented approach creates workflow friction and increases project complexity.
• Optimal's Advantage: Optimal delivers recruitment, testing, and analysis within a single platform. Teams can recruit participants, conduct UX tests, analyze results, and generate insights without switching between tools or managing multiple vendor relationships.

‍

Global Reach and Participant Quality

‍

• Regional Limitations: Askable's participant panel concentrates heavily in Australia and New Zealand, limiting global research capabilities. For enterprises requiring international insights, this geographic constraint becomes a significant bottleneck.
• Worldwide Coverage: Optimal partners with 100+ million verified participants across 150+ countries, enabling global research at scale. Advanced fraud prevention and screening protocols ensure participant quality regardless of location.

‍

Pricing Structure and Cost Predictability

‍

• Variable Costs: Askable employs credit-based pricing that scales with session length, making long-form research sessions increasingly expensive and budget planning difficult.
• Transparent Pricing: Optimal offers flat-rate pricing regardless of session duration, eliminating hidden fees and enabling predictable research budgets for extended studies.

‍

Why Enterprises Choose Optimal Over Askable

‍

1. Operational Efficiency. Teams using Askable must coordinate between recruitment services and separate testing platforms, creating project management overhead. Optimal eliminates this complexity by providing integrated recruitment and testing capabilities.‍
2. Advanced Research Capabilities. While Askable focuses on participant recruitment, Optimal includes: Built-in UX testing tools, AI-powered analysis and insights, Automated reporting and visualization, Survey and prototype testing capabilities‍
3. Enterprise-Grade Support. Optimal provides dedicated account management and comprehensive fraud prevention assurance, whereas Askable offers standard support options without the specialized enterprise features global brands require.‍
4. Scalability for Growing Teams. Askable's recruitment-only model doesn't scale with research program maturity. As teams need more sophisticated testing and analysis capabilities, they must invest in additional tools. Optimal grows with research programs from basic recruitment through advanced insight generation.

‍

Ready to see how leading brands including Lego, Netflix and Nike achieve better research outcomes? Experience how Optimal's platform delivers user insights that adapt to your team's growing needs.

‍