5 mins

Making the Complex Simple: Clarity as a UX Superpower in Financial Services

In the realm of financial services, complexity isn't just a challenge, it's the default state. From intricate investment products to multi-layered insurance policies to complex fee structures, financial services are inherently complicated. But your users don't want complexity; they want confidence, clarity, and control over their financial lives.

How to keep things simple with good UX research 

Understanding how users perceive and navigate complexity requires systematic research. Optimal's platform offers specialized tools to identify complexity pain points and validate simplification strategies:

Uncover Navigation Challenges with Tree Testing

Complex financial products often create equally complex navigation structures:

How can you solve this? 

  • Test how easily users can find key information within your financial platform
  • Identify terminology and organizational structures that confuse users
  • Compare different information architectures to find the most intuitive organization

Identify Confusion Points with First-Click Testing

Understanding where users instinctively look for information reveals valuable insights about mental models:

How can you solve this? 

  • Test where users click when trying to accomplish common financial tasks
  • Compare multiple interface designs for complex financial tools
  • Identify misalignments between expected and actual user behavior

Understand User Mental Models with Card Sorting

Financial terminology and categorization often don't align with how customers think:

How can you solve this? 

  • Use open card sorts to understand how users naturally group financial concepts
  • Test comprehension of financial terminology
  • Identify intuitive labels for complex financial products

Practical Strategies for Simplifying Financial UX

1. Progressive Information Disclosure

Rather than bombarding users with all information at once, layer information from essential to detailed:

  • Start with core concepts and benefits
  • Provide expandable sections for those who want deeper dives
  • Use tooltips and contextual help for terminology
  • Create information hierarchies that guide users from basic to advanced understanding

2. Visual Representation of Numerical Concepts

Financial services are inherently numerical, but humans don't naturally think in numbers—we think in pictures and comparisons.

What could this look like? 

  • Use visual scales and comparisons instead of just presenting raw numbers
  • Implement interactive calculators that show real-time impact of choices
  • Create visual hierarchies that guide attention to most relevant figures
  • Design comparative visualizations that put numbers in context

3. Contextual Decision Support

Users don't just need information; they need guidance relevant to their specific situation.

How do you solve for this? 

  • Design contextual recommendations based on user data
  • Provide comparison tools that highlight differences relevant to the user
  • Offer scenario modeling that shows outcomes of different choices
  • Implement guided decision flows for complex choices

4. Language Simplification and Standardization

Financial jargon is perhaps the most visible form of unnecessary complexity. So, what can you do? 

  • Develop and enforce a simplified language style guide
  • Create a financial glossary integrated contextually into the experience
  • Test copy with actual users, measuring comprehension, not just preference
  • Replace industry terms with everyday language when possible

Measuring Simplification Success

To determine whether your simplification efforts are working, establish a continuous measurement program:

1. Establish Complexity Baselines

Use Optimal's tools to create baseline measurements:

  • Success rates for completing complex tasks
  • Time required to find critical information
  • Comprehension scores for key financial concepts
  • User confidence ratings for financial decisions

2. Implement Iterative Testing

Before launching major simplification initiatives, validate improvements through:

  • A/B testing of alternative explanations and designs
  • Comparative testing of current vs. simplified interfaces
  • Comprehension testing of revised terminology and content

3. Track Simplification Metrics Over Time

Create a dashboard of key simplification indicators:

  • Task success rates for complex financial activities
  • Support call volume related to confusion
  • Feature adoption rates for previously underutilized tools
  • User-reported confidence in financial decisions

Where rubber hits the road: Organizational Commitment to Clarity

True simplification goes beyond interface design. It requires organizational commitment at the most foundational level:

  • Product development: Are we creating inherently understandable products?
  • Legal and compliance: Can we satisfy requirements while maintaining clarity?
  • Marketing: Are we setting appropriate expectations about complexity?
  • Customer service: Are we gathering intelligence about confusion points?

When there is a deep commitment from the entire organization to simplification, it becomes part of a businesses’ UX DNA. 

Conclusion: The Future Belongs to the Clear

As financial services become increasingly digital and self-directed, clarity bcomes essential for business success. The financial brands that will thrive in the coming decade won't necessarily be those with the most features or the lowest fees, but those that make the complex world of finance genuinely understandable to everyday users.

By embracing clarity as a core design principle and supporting it with systematic user research, you're not just improving user experience, you're democratizing financial success itself.

Share this article
Author
Optimal
Workshop

Related articles

View all blog articles
Learn more
1 min read

Empowering UX Careers: Designlab Joins Forces with Optimal Workshop

Optimal Workshop is thrilled to welcome Designlab as our newest education partner. This collaboration merges our strengths to provide innovative learning opportunities for UX professionals looking to sharpen their design skills and elevate their careers. 

The Power of a Design-First Education Partner

What makes Designlab unique is its exclusive focus on design education. For more than a decade, they have dedicated themselves to providing hands-on learning experiences that  combine asynchronous, online lessons and projects with synchronous group sessions and expert mentorship. With a robust catalog of industry-relevant courses and an alumni network of over 20,000 professionals, Designlab is committed to empowering designers to make an impact at both individual and team levels.

What Designlab Offers for Experienced Designers

Designlab offers a range of advanced programs that support ongoing professional development. Some courses that might be interesting for our audience include:

  • Data-Driven Design: Gain confidence in your ability to collect and interpret data, justify design decisions with business impact, and win over stakeholders. 
  • Advanced Figma: Accelerate your design workflow and become a more efficient Figma user by learning tools like components, auto-layout, and design tokens. 
  • Strategic Business Acumen for Designers: Learn the foundational business knowledge and frameworks you need to influence strategy and get your design career to the next level.  
  • Advanced Usability and Accessibility: Strengthen your usability and accessibility skills, integrate universal design principles into your work, and improve advocacy for inclusivity in design.  

These courses ensure that experienced designers can enhance their technical and strategic skills to solve complex problems, lead projects, and design user-centered experiences.

Solutions for Design Teams

Designlab also offers solutions for design teams looking to upskill together. These solutions can range from multi-seat enrollments to their courses to custom facilitation and training programs, perfectly tailored to your teams’ needs. By partnering with Designlab, companies ensure their teams are equipped with practical skills and a forward-thinking mindset to tackle design challenges effectively.

READ: Designing for Accessibility with The Home Depot

Special Offer for the Optimal Workshop Community

To celebrate this partnership, Optimal Workshop users can take advantage of a special discount—$100 off any Designlab course with the code OPTIMAL. Whether you’re looking to refine your skills or explore new areas of expertise, Designlab’s programs offer the perfect opportunity to invest in your professional growth.

Explore how Designlab’s offerings can help you level up your design career—whether it’s through mastering advanced tools, leveraging data more, or becoming a more strategic thinker. With continuous learning at the heart of success in UX and product design, there’s no better time to start your journey with Designlab.

Unlock your potential and discover new possibilities with Designlab’s courses today. Use code OPTIMAL to save $100 on your next course and take the next step in your design career.

Learn more
1 min read

The Evolution of UX Research: Digital Twins and the Future of User Insight

Introduction

User Experience (UX) research has always been about people. How they think, how they behave, what they need, and—just as importantly—what they don’t yet realise they need. Traditional UX methodologies have long relied on direct human input: interviews, usability testing, surveys, and behavioral observation. The assumption was clear—if you want to understand people, you have to engage with real humans.

But in 2025, that assumption is being challenged.

The emergence of digital twins and synthetic users—AI-powered simulations of human behavior—is changing how researchers approach user insights. These technologies claim to solve persistent UX research problems: slow participant recruitment, small sample sizes, high costs, and research timelines that struggle to keep pace with product development. The promise is enticing: instantly accessible, infinitely scalable users who can test, interact, and generate feedback without the logistical headaches of working with real participants.

Yet, as with any new technology, there are trade-offs. While digital twins may unlock efficiencies, they also raise important questions: Can they truly replicate human complexity? Where do they fit within existing research practices? What risks do they introduce?

This article explores the evolving role of digital twins in UX research—where they excel, where they fall short, and what their rise means for the future of human-centered design.

The Traditional UX Research Model: Why Change?

For decades, UX research has been grounded in methodologies that involve direct human participation. The core methods—usability testing, user interviews, ethnographic research, and behavioral analytics—have been refined to account for the unpredictability of human nature.

This approach works well, but it has challenges:

  1. Participant recruitment is time-consuming. Finding the right users—especially niche audiences—can be a logistical hurdle, often requiring specialised panels, incentives, and scheduling gymnastics.
  2. Research is expensive. Incentives, moderation, analysis, and recruitment all add to the cost. A single usability study can run into tens of thousands of dollars.
  3. Small sample sizes create risk. Budget and timeline constraints often mean testing with small groups, leaving room for blind spots and bias.
  4. Long feedback loops slow decision-making. By the time research is completed, product teams may have already moved on, limiting its impact.

In short: traditional UX research provides depth and authenticity, but it’s not always fast or scalable.

Digital twins and synthetic users aim to change that.

What Are Digital Twins and Synthetic Users?

While the terms digital twins and synthetic users are sometimes used interchangeably, they are distinct concepts.

Digital Twins: Simulating Real-World Behavior

A digital twin is a data-driven virtual representation of a real-world entity. Originally developed for industrial applications, digital twins replicate machines, environments, and human behavior in a digital space. They can be updated in real time using live data, allowing organisations to analyse scenarios, predict outcomes, and optimise performance.

In UX research, human digital twins attempt to replicate real users' behavioral patterns, decision-making processes, and interactions. They draw on existing datasets to mirror real-world users dynamically, adapting based on real-time inputs.

Synthetic Users: AI-Generated Research Participants

While a digital twin is a mirror of a real entity, a synthetic user is a fabricated research participant—a simulation that mimics human decision-making, behaviors, and responses. These AI-generated personas can be used in research scenarios to interact with products, answer questions, and simulate user journeys.

Unlike traditional user personas (which are static profiles based on aggregated research), synthetic users are interactive and capable of generating dynamic feedback. They aren’t modeled after a specific real-world person, but rather a combination of user behaviors drawn from large datasets.

Think of it this way:

  • A digital twin is a highly detailed, data-driven clone of a specific person, customer segment, or process.
  • A synthetic user is a fictional but realistic simulation of a potential user, generated based on behavioral patterns and demographic characteristics.

Both approaches are still evolving, but their potential applications in UX research are already taking shape.

Where Digital Twins and Synthetic Users Fit into UX Research

The appeal of AI-generated users is undeniable. They can:

  • Scale instantly – Test designs with thousands of simulated users, rather than just a handful of real participants.
  • Eliminate recruitment bottlenecks – No need to chase down participants or schedule interviews.
  • Reduce costs – No incentives, no travel, no last-minute no-shows.
  • Enable rapid iteration – Get user insights in real time and adjust designs on the fly.
  • Generate insights on sensitive topics – Synthetic users can explore scenarios that real participants might find too personal or intrusive.

These capabilities make digital twins particularly useful for:

  • Early-stage concept validation – Rapidly test ideas before committing to development.
  • Edge case identification – Run simulations to explore rare but critical user scenarios.
  • Pre-testing before live usability sessions – Identify glaring issues before investing in human research.

However, digital twins and synthetic users are not a replacement for human research. Their effectiveness is limited in areas where emotional, cultural, and contextual factors play a major role.

The Risks and Limitations of AI-Driven UX Research

For all their promise, digital twins and synthetic users introduce new challenges.

  1. They lack genuine emotional responses.
    AI can analyse sentiment, but it doesn’t feel frustration, delight, or confusion the way a human does. UX is often about unexpected moments—the frustrations, workarounds, and “aha” realisations that define real-world use.
  2. Bias is a real problem.
    AI models are trained on existing datasets, meaning they inherit and amplify biases in those datasets. If synthetic users are based on an incomplete or non-diverse dataset, the research insights they generate will be skewed.
  3. They struggle with novelty.
    Humans are unpredictable. They find unexpected uses for products, misunderstand instructions, and behave irrationally. AI models, no matter how advanced, can only predict behavior based on past patterns—not the unexpected ways real users might engage with a product.
  4. They require careful validation.
    How do we know that insights from digital twins align with real-world user behavior? Without rigorous validation against human data, there’s a risk of over-reliance on synthetic feedback that doesn’t reflect reality.

A Hybrid Future: AI + Human UX Research

Rather than viewing digital twins as a replacement for human research, the best UX teams will integrate them as a complementary tool.

Where AI Can Lead:

  • Large-scale pattern identification
  • Early-stage usability evaluations
  • Speeding up research cycles
  • Automating repetitive testing

Where Humans Remain Essential:

  • Understanding emotion, frustration, and delight
  • Detecting unexpected behaviors
  • Validating insights with real-world context
  • Ethical considerations and cultural nuance

The future of UX research is not about choosing between AI and human research—it’s about blending the strengths of both.

Final Thoughts: Proceeding With Caution and Curiosity

Digital twins and synthetic users are exciting, but they are not a magic bullet. They cannot fully replace human users, and relying on them exclusively could lead to false confidence in flawed insights.

Instead, UX researchers should view these technologies as powerful, but imperfect tools—best used in combination with traditional research methods.

As with any new technology, thoughtful implementation is key. The real opportunity lies in designing research methodologies that harness the speed and scale of AI without losing the depth, nuance, and humanity that make UX research truly valuable.

The challenge ahead isn’t about choosing between human or synthetic research. It’s about finding the right balance—one that keeps user experience truly human-centered, even in an AI-driven world.

This article was researched with the help of Perplexity.ai. 

Learn more
1 min read

Optimal vs. Maze: Deep User Insights or Surface-Level Design Feedback

Product teams face an important decision when selecting the right user research platform: do they prioritize speed and simplicity, or invest in a more comprehensive platform that offers real research depth and insights? This choice becomes even more critical as user research scales and those insights directly influence major product decisions.

Maze has gained popularity in recent years among design and product teams for its focus on rapid prototype testing and design workflow integration. However, as teams scale their research programs and require more sophisticated insights, many discover that Maze's limitations outweigh its simplicity. Platform stability issues, restricted tools and functionality, and a lack of enterprise features creates friction that end up compromising insight speed, quality and overall business impact.

Why Choose Optimal instead of Maze?

Platform Depth

Test Design Limitations

  • Maze has Rigid Question Types: Maze's focus on speed comes with design inflexibility, including rigid question structures and limited customization options that reduce overall test effectiveness.
  • Optimal Offers Comprehensive Test Flexibility: Optimal has a Figma integration, image import capabilities, and fully customizable test flows designed for agile product teams.

Prototype Testing Capabilities

  • Maze has Limited Prototype Support: Users report difficulties with Maze's prototype testing capabilities, particularly with complex interactions and advanced design systems that modern products require.
  • Optimal has Advanced Prototype Testing: Optimal supports sophisticated prototype testing with full Figma integration, comprehensive interaction capture, and flexible testing methods that accommodate modern product design and development workflows.

Analysis and Reporting Quality

  • Maze Only Offers Surface-Level Reporting: Maze provides basic metrics and surface-level analysis without the depth required for strategic decision-making or comprehensive user insight.
  • Optimal has Rich, Actionable Insights: Optimal delivers AI-powered analysis with layered insights, export-ready reports, and sophisticated visualizations that transform data into actionable business intelligence.

Enterprise Features

  • Maze has a Reactive Support Model: Maze provides responsive support primarily for critical issues but lacks the proactive, dedicated support enterprise product teams require.
  • Optimal Provides Dedicated Enterprise Support: Optimal offers fast, personalized support with dedicated account teams and comprehensive training resources built by user experience experts that ensure your team is set up for success.

Enterprise Readiness

  • Maze is Buit for Individuals: Maze was built primarily for individual designers and small teams, lacking the enterprise features, compliance capabilities, and scalability that large organizations need.
  • Optimal is an Enterprise-Built Platform: Optimal was designed for enterprise use with comprehensive security protocols, compliance certifications, and scalability features that support large research programs across multiple teams and business units. Optimal is currently trusted by some of the world’s biggest brands including Netflix, Lego and Nike. 

Enterprises Need Reliable, Scalable User Insights

While Maze's focus on speed appeals to design teams seeking rapid iteration, enterprise product teams need the stability and reliability that only mature platforms provide. Optimal delivers both speed and dependability, enabling teams to iterate quickly without compromising research quality or business impact.Platform reliability isn't just about uptime, it's about helping product teams make high quality strategic decisions and to build organizational confidence in user insights. Mature product, design and UX teams need to choose platforms that enhance rather than undermine their research credibility.

Don't let platform limitations compromise your research potential.

Ready to see how leading brands including Lego, Netflix and Nike achieve better research outcomes? Experience how Optimal's platform delivers user insights that adapt to your team's growing needs.

Seeing is believing

Explore our tools and see how Optimal makes gathering insights simple, powerful, and impactful.